E-FREEZE: a randomised controlled trial evaluating the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a policy of freezing all embryos followed by thawed frozen embryo transfer, compared with a policy of fresh embryo transfer in women undergoing in-vitro fertilization.

  • Maheshwari, Abha (Principal Investigator)
  • Raine-Fenning, Nicholas (Co-Investigator)
  • Hardy, Pollyanna (Co-Investigator)
  • Child, Tim (Co-Investigator)
  • Rajkohwa, Madhurima (Co-Investigator)
  • Troup, Stephen (Co-Investigator)
  • Khalaf, Yacoub (Co-Investigator)
  • Harbottle, Stephen (Co-Investigator)
  • Lavery, Stuart (Co-Investigator)
  • Lewis-Jones, Clare (Co-Investigator)
  • Cutting, Rachel (Co-Investigator)
  • Coomarasamy, Arri (Co-Investigator)
  • Brison, Daniel (Co-Investigator)
  • Juszczak, Edmund (Co-Investigator)
  • Scotland, Graham (Co-Investigator)
  • Kurinczuk, Jennifer J (Co-Investigator)
  • Macklon, Nicholas (Co-Investigator)
  • Bhattacharya, Siladitya (Co-Investigator)

Project: Other External Funding

Project Details

Description / Abstract

In-vitro fertilization (IVF) involves several steps. Initially, hormones are used to stimulate the ovaries to produce eggs which are harvested surgically. Next, embryos are created outside the body by mixing eggs with sperm. Embryos are grown in culture for a few days before transfer within the uterus (fresh embryo transfer). Despite improvements in technology, IVF success rates remain low (25% live birth rate). There are concerns about maternal and perinatal outcomes. Systematic reviews have shown poorer outcomes in pregnancies following IVF, particularly after fresh embryo transfer. The process of IVF also incurs a risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) which can cause serious maternal morbidity and rarely, mortality. It has been suggested that avoiding fresh embryo transfer by freezing all good quality embryos with the intention of thawing and subsequent replacement into the uterus at a later stage (thawed frozen embryo transfer) may lead to improved pregnancy rates and fewer complications. Good quality embryos are defined as those with 6 8 cells grade 3/3 or above using the agreed national grading scheme on day 3. However, the existing evidence base from three small randomised trials (and the resulting meta-analysis) is inadequate to justify such a radical change in practice. A two-arm parallel group randomised controlled trial is proposed across ten IVF centres in the UK. Women under 42 years of age undergoing their first IVF treatment, with at least 3 good quality embryos, will be randomised to receiving either thawed frozen embryo transfer or fresh embryo transfer, within 3 months of egg collection. Embryo freezing and subsequent replacement of spare embryos is now an established part of IVF and is endorsed by NICE. The trial population has been chosen in line with NICE guidance as to who should be offered NHS funded treatment. A single episode of thawed frozen embryo transfer (following freezing of all good quality embryos) will be compared to a single episode of fresh embryo transfer with the primary outcome comprising a healthy baby: a live singleton baby born at term with an appropriate weight for gestation (AGA). A composite primary outcome has been chosen to reflect safety (single, term and AGA) and effectiveness (live birth) as the goal of modern IVF is accepted to be a healthy baby and a healthy mother (with no OHSS). With 90% power and a two-sided 5% level of statistical significance, we will need to randomise 1,086 women (543 in each arm) over a 2 year period to show an absolute difference in the primary outcome of at least 9% (e.g. from 25% to 34%), between fresh and thawed frozen embryo transfer respectively. Such a difference was considered to be clinically important by an expert panel of clinicians in order to recommend a change in clinical practice, considering the extra time, effort and cost involved in freezing all embryos. A full economic evaluation will assess the costs and consequences of the new strategy compared with standard practice. The trial data will be combined with modelling to estimate the long term costs of health and social care using a previously developed decision analytic model. The assembled team comprises experienced clinicians from IVF units, clinical academics, scientists, clinical embryologists, user representatives and clinical trial methodologists (statisticians, epidemiologists and health economists) in order to conduct the definitive trial of the highest quality.
StatusFinished
Effective start/end date1/08/1531/01/21