Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A pain research strategy for Europe: A European survey and position paper of the European Pain Federation EFIC

  • Gisèle Pickering
  • , Mary O'Keeffe
  • , Kirsty Bannister
  • , Susanne Becker
  • , Sonia Cottom
  • , Felicia J. Cox
  • , Elon Eisenberg
  • , David P. Finn
  • , Patrice Forget
  • , Thomas Graven-Nielsen
  • , Eija Kalso
  • , Magdalena Kocot-Kepska
  • , Hugo Leite-Almeida
  • , Jose Antonio Lopez-Garcia
  • , Mira Meeus
  • , André Mouraux
  • , Bruno Pereira
  • , Livia Puljak
  • , Michiel F. Reneman
  • , Iben Rohde
  • Ioannis Sotiropoulos, Nathan Skidmore, Thomas R. Tölle, Snezana Tomasevic Todorovic, Andrea Truini, Kevin E. Vowles, Esther Pogatzki-Zahn, Luis Garcia-Larrea, Brona M. Fullen* (Corresponding Author)
*Corresponding author for this work
  • CHU de Clermont-Ferrand
  • Université Clermont Auvergne
  • University College Dublin
  • King's College London
  • Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
  • Pain Association Scotland
  • Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust
  • Technion-Israel Institute of Technology
  • University of Galway
  • European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care
  • Nimes University Hospital
  • NHS Grampian
  • Aalborg University
  • University of Helsinki
  • Jagiellonian University Medical College
  • University of Minho
  • Clinical Academic Center (2CA)
  • University of Alcalá
  • Pain in Motion International Research Consortium
  • University of Antwerp
  • Université catholique de Louvain
  • Catholic University of Croatia
  • University of Groningen
  • Pain Alliance Europe (PAE)
  • FAKS – Foreningen af kroniske smerteramte og pårørende
  • Demokritos National Centre for Scientific Research
  • Teesside University
  • Technical University of Munich
  • University of Novi Sad
  • Clinic University Clinical Centre of Vojvodina
  • University of Rome La Sapienza
  • Queen's University Belfast
  • University of Münster
  • & Claude Bernard University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Pain is the leading cause of disability and reduced quality of life worldwide. Despite the increasing burden for patients and healthcare systems, pain research remains underfunded and under focused. Having stakeholders identify and prioritize areas that need urgent attention in the field will help focus funding topics, reduce ‘research waste’, improve the effectiveness of pain research and therapy and promote the uptake of research evidence. In this study, the European Pain Federation (EFIC) developed a Pain Research Strategy for Europe. 

Methods: The study used multiple methods, including literature searches, multidisciplinary expert debate, a survey and a final consensus meeting. The cross-sectional survey was conducted among 628 European pain researchers, clinicians, educators and industry professionals to obtain the rating and hierarchy of pain research priorities. The final consensus meeting involved a multidisciplinary expert panel including people with lived experience from 23 countries. The survey results guided discussions where top priorities were agreed.

 Results: Content analysis identified nine survey themes, of which five emerged as top priorities: (i) understand the pathophysiology of pain; (ii) understand and address comorbidities; (iii) critically assess current therapies; (iv) develop new treatments; and (v) explore the biopsychosocial impacts of pain. Physical, psychological and social approaches were prioritized at the same level as pharmacological treatments. The top priorities were endorsed by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The panel emphasized the importance of also clearly communicating the concepts of prediction, prevention self-management and personalized pain management in the final strategy. 

Conclusions: The content of the final top research priorities' list reflects a holistic approach to pain management. The equal importance given to physical, psychological and social aspects alongside pharmacological treatments highlights the importance of a comprehensive biopsychosocial-orientated research strategy. The expert panel's endorsement of five top priorities, coupled with an emphasis on communicating the concepts of prediction, prevention, self-management and personalized pain management, provides a clear direction for future basic, translational and clinical research. Significance: EFIC has developed a Pain Research Strategy for Europe that identifies pain research areas deserving the most focus and financial support. Implementation and wide dissemination of this Strategy is vital to increase the conduct of urgent pain projects, pain research funding and the implementation of research findings into practice, to ultimately decrease the personal, societal and financial burden of pain.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere4767
Pages (from-to)e4767
Number of pages25
JournalEuropean Journal of Pain
Volume29
Issue number1
Early online date10 Dec 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2025

Bibliographical note

The authors thank Melinda Borzsak-Schramm, Christel Geevels and Sam Kynman (EFIC's Executive Office) for organizational support.

Data Availability Statement

Additional supporting information can be found online in the Supporting Information section at the end of this article.

Funding

This project received funding from the Network of European Funding for Neuroscience Research (ERA-NET Neuron Transnational Networking Groups on Chronic Pain 2022.ANR-23-NEUG-0001-01).

FundersFunder number
Network of European Funding for Neuroscience Research ANR-23-NEUG-0001-01

    Keywords

    • Humans
    • Europe
    • Pain Management/methods
    • Cross-Sectional Studies
    • Pain
    • Surveys and Questionnaires
    • Biomedical Research
    • Research

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'A pain research strategy for Europe: A European survey and position paper of the European Pain Federation EFIC'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this