A study protocol of qualitative data sharing practices in clinical trials in the UK and Ireland: towards the production of good practice guidance [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]

  • Catherine Houghton
  • , Megan McCarthy* (Corresponding Author)
  • , Katie Gillies
  • , Nikki Rousseau
  • , Julia Wade
  • , Carrol Gamble
  • , Elaine Toomey
  • , Karen Matvienko-Sikar
  • , Matthew Sydes
  • , Maura Dowling
  • , Val Bryant
  • , Linda Biesty
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)
3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Data sharing enables researchers to conduct novel research with previously collected data sets, thus maximising scientific findings and cost effectiveness, and reducing research waste. The value of sharing anonymised data from clinical trials is well recognised with a moderated access approach recommended. While substantial challenges to data sharing remain, there are additional challenges for qualitative data. Qualitative data including videos, interviews, and observations are often more readily identifiable than quantitative data. Existing guidance from UK Economic and Social Research Council applies to sharing qualitative data but does not address the additional challenges related to sharing qualitative data collected within trials, including the need to incorporate the necessary information and consent into already complex recruitment processes, with the additional sensitive nature of health-related data. Methods: Work package 1 will involve separate focus group interviews with members of each stakeholder group: trial managers, clinical trialists, qualitative researchers, members of research funding bodies and trial participants who have been involved in qualitative research. Data will be analysed using thematic analysis and managed within QSR NVivo to enhance transparency. Work package 2 will involve a documentary analysis of current consent procedures for qualitative data collected as part of the conduct of clinical trials. We will include documents such as participant information leaflets and consent forms for the qualitative components in trials. We will extract data such as whether specific clauses for data sharing are included in the consent form. Content analysis will be used to analyse whether and how consent is being obtained for qualitative data sharing. Conclusions: This study will provide insight into the existing practice of sharing of qualitative data in clinical trials and the current issues and opportunities, to help shape future research and development of guidance to encourage maximum learning to be gained from this valuable data.

Original languageEnglish
Article number47
Number of pages13
JournalHRB Open Research
Volume4
Early online date10 May 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 22 Jun 2021

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
The work is funded by the Health Research Board-Trials Methodology Research Network Ireland award [HRB-TMRN-2017-1].

Data Availability Statement

Underlying data:
No data is associated with this article.

Extended data:
Open Science Framework: Qualitative data sharing practices in clinical trials in the UK and Ireland: Towards the production of good practice guidance. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/BKC8D. (Houghton et al., 2021).

This study contains the following extended data:

• Appendix 1: Recruitment emails

• Appendix 2: Participant Information leaflets

• Appendix 3: Informed consent form

• Appendix 4: Distress Protocol

• Appendix 5: Focus group Interview guide

Data are available under the terms of the https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode. (CC-BY 4.0)

Funding

The work is funded by the Health Research Board-Trials Methodology Research Network Ireland award [HRB-TMRN-2017-1].

Keywords

  • data sharing
  • focus groups
  • qualitative
  • trials

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A study protocol of qualitative data sharing practices in clinical trials in the UK and Ireland: towards the production of good practice guidance [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this