AB v HM Advocate: Rationalising Restrictions on the Use of the "Reasonable Belief" Defence

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

12 Downloads (Pure)

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Accepted Manuscript
This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication inJuridical Review following peer review. The definitive published version Callander, I 2017, 'AB v HM Advocate: Rationalising Restrictions on the Use of the "Reasonable Belief" Defence' Juridical Review, no. 3, pp. 179-185. is available online on Westlaw UK or from Thomson Reuters DocDel service .
Accepted author manuscript, 149 KBLicence: Unspecified

@article{0adaf51f45ab46eb85bfe1c67e5e72a7,

title = "AB v HM Advocate: Rationalising Restrictions on the Use of the {"}Reasonable Belief{"} Defence",

keywords = "child sex offences, defences, reasonable belief, right to respect for private and family life, Scotland, criminal law",

author = "Isla Callander",

year = "2017",

month = oct,

language = "English",

pages = "179--185",

journal = "Juridical Review",

issn = "0022-6785",

publisher = "W. Green \& sons",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - AB v HM Advocate: Rationalising Restrictions on the Use of the "Reasonable Belief" Defence

AU - Callander, Isla

PY - 2017/10

Y1 - 2017/10

KW - child sex offences

KW - defences

KW - reasonable belief

KW - right to respect for private and family life

KW - Scotland

KW - criminal law

M3 - Review article

SN - 0022-6785

SP - 179

EP - 185

JO - Juridical Review

JF - Juridical Review

IS - 3

ER -