An Argumentation Workflow for Reasoning in Ontology Based Data Access

Bruno Yun, Madalina Croitoru

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingPublished conference contribution

6 Citations (Scopus)


In this paper we demonstrate how to benefit from structured argumentation frameworks and their implementations to provide for reasoning capabilities of Ontology Based Data Access systems under inconsistency tolerant semantics. More precisely, given an inconsistent Datalog± knowledge base we instantiate it using the ASPIC+ framework and show that the reasoning provided by ASPIC+ is equivalent to the main inconsistent tolerant semantics in the literature. We provide a workflow that shows the practical interoperability of the logic based frameworks handling Datalog± and ASPIC+.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationComputational Models of Argument
Subtitle of host publicationProceedings of COMMA 2016
EditorsPietro Baroni, Thomas F Gordon, Tatjana Scheffler, Manfred Stede
PublisherIOS Press
Number of pages8
ISBN (Electronic)978-1-61499-686-6
ISBN (Print)978-1-61499-685-9
Publication statusPublished - 2016
EventCOMMA 2016 - University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany
Duration: 13 Sept 201616 Sept 2016

Publication series

NameFrontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications
PublisherIOS Press
ISSN (Print)0922-6389
ISSN (Electronic)1879-8314


ConferenceCOMMA 2016


Dive into the research topics of 'An Argumentation Workflow for Reasoning in Ontology Based Data Access'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this