An Economic and Policy Case for Development of the Controversial Cambo Field in the UK Continental Shelf

Yakubu Abdul-Salam

doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.103070

An Economic and Policy Case for Development of the Controversial Cambo Field in the UK Continental Shelf

Yakubu Abdul-Salam^* (Corresponding Author)

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

A raging debate currently persists regarding the future political economy of the UK Continental Shelf (UKCS) in relation to the prudence of new field developments in the province. Leading up to the COP26 global summit in November 2021, this debate had sharply centred on the pending application for consent to develop the Cambo field in the West of Shetland region of the province. Opposers of the field have called for a rejection of the application for consent to develop the field, citing the recent IEA and UN IPCC reports urging significant reductions in petroleum developments globally. Proponents of the field however argue that oil and gas remain vital to UK energy security as it transitions to net-zero; an argument that has been bolstered by the dynamics of the energy industry since the commencement of the Russia-Ukraine war and the resulting geopolitical fallouts and supply chain disruptions. This paper examines the commercial viability of the Cambo field to make an economic and policy case for its development. I recommend that owing to its high economic viability and low carbon intensity, the UK Government should consider approving the application for consent to develop the field, contingent on a stringent carbon emissions reduction programme for the field being implemented. This recommendation is consistent with a ‘just’ approach to energy transition, as well as the UK’s policy of maximising economic recovery (MER) from the wider UKCS sector.

Original language	English
Article number	103070
Number of pages	11
Journal	Resources Policy
Volume	79
Early online date	21 Oct 2022
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.103070
Publication status	Published - 1 Dec 2022

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
I would like to thank my colleagues in the University of Aberdeen Business School (Economics Department), in particular Prof Euan Phimister, who provided valuable feedback on an earlier version of this paper. I would also like to thank the Editor of this journal for his valuable feedback during the review process.
Acknowledgement
I would like to thank my colleagues in the University of Aberdeen Business School (Economics Department), in particular Prof Euan Phimister, who provided valuable feedback on an earlier version of this paper. I would also like to thank the Editor of this journal for his valuable feedback during the review process.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy
SDG 13 Climate Action

Keywords

Cambo
UKCS
Economic
Policy
Energy Transition
MER

Access to Document

10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.103070Licence: Unspecified

Abdul_RP_An_Economic_And_AAM
© 2022. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Accepted author manuscript, 813 KBLicence: CC BY-NC-ND

Cite this

@article{aa9093910a6a4abdbb38ea2306b86d58,

title = "An Economic and Policy Case for Development of the Controversial Cambo Field in the UK Continental Shelf",

abstract = "A raging debate currently persists regarding the future political economy of the UK Continental Shelf (UKCS) in relation to the prudence of new field developments in the province. Leading up to the COP26 global summit in November 2021, this debate had sharply centred on the pending application for consent to develop the Cambo field in the West of Shetland region of the province. Opposers of the field have called for a rejection of the application for consent to develop the field, citing the recent IEA and UN IPCC reports urging significant reductions in petroleum developments globally. Proponents of the field however argue that oil and gas remain vital to UK energy security as it transitions to net-zero; an argument that has been bolstered by the dynamics of the energy industry since the commencement of the Russia-Ukraine war and the resulting geopolitical fallouts and supply chain disruptions. This paper examines the commercial viability of the Cambo field to make an economic and policy case for its development. I recommend that owing to its high economic viability and low carbon intensity, the UK Government should consider approving the application for consent to develop the field, contingent on a stringent carbon emissions reduction programme for the field being implemented. This recommendation is consistent with a {\textquoteleft}just{\textquoteright} approach to energy transition, as well as the UK{\textquoteright}s policy of maximising economic recovery (MER) from the wider UKCS sector.",

keywords = "Cambo, UKCS, Economic, Policy, Energy Transition, MER",

author = "Yakubu Abdul-Salam",

note = "Funding Information: I would like to thank my colleagues in the University of Aberdeen Business School (Economics Department), in particular Prof Euan Phimister, who provided valuable feedback on an earlier version of this paper. I would also like to thank the Editor of this journal for his valuable feedback during the review process. Acknowledgement I would like to thank my colleagues in the University of Aberdeen Business School (Economics Department), in particular Prof Euan Phimister, who provided valuable feedback on an earlier version of this paper. I would also like to thank the Editor of this journal for his valuable feedback during the review process.",

year = "2022",

month = dec,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.103070",

language = "English",

volume = "79",

journal = "Resources Policy ",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An Economic and Policy Case for Development of the Controversial Cambo Field in the UK Continental Shelf

AU - Abdul-Salam, Yakubu

N1 - Funding Information: I would like to thank my colleagues in the University of Aberdeen Business School (Economics Department), in particular Prof Euan Phimister, who provided valuable feedback on an earlier version of this paper. I would also like to thank the Editor of this journal for his valuable feedback during the review process. Acknowledgement I would like to thank my colleagues in the University of Aberdeen Business School (Economics Department), in particular Prof Euan Phimister, who provided valuable feedback on an earlier version of this paper. I would also like to thank the Editor of this journal for his valuable feedback during the review process.

PY - 2022/12/1

Y1 - 2022/12/1

N2 - A raging debate currently persists regarding the future political economy of the UK Continental Shelf (UKCS) in relation to the prudence of new field developments in the province. Leading up to the COP26 global summit in November 2021, this debate had sharply centred on the pending application for consent to develop the Cambo field in the West of Shetland region of the province. Opposers of the field have called for a rejection of the application for consent to develop the field, citing the recent IEA and UN IPCC reports urging significant reductions in petroleum developments globally. Proponents of the field however argue that oil and gas remain vital to UK energy security as it transitions to net-zero; an argument that has been bolstered by the dynamics of the energy industry since the commencement of the Russia-Ukraine war and the resulting geopolitical fallouts and supply chain disruptions. This paper examines the commercial viability of the Cambo field to make an economic and policy case for its development. I recommend that owing to its high economic viability and low carbon intensity, the UK Government should consider approving the application for consent to develop the field, contingent on a stringent carbon emissions reduction programme for the field being implemented. This recommendation is consistent with a ‘just’ approach to energy transition, as well as the UK’s policy of maximising economic recovery (MER) from the wider UKCS sector.

AB - A raging debate currently persists regarding the future political economy of the UK Continental Shelf (UKCS) in relation to the prudence of new field developments in the province. Leading up to the COP26 global summit in November 2021, this debate had sharply centred on the pending application for consent to develop the Cambo field in the West of Shetland region of the province. Opposers of the field have called for a rejection of the application for consent to develop the field, citing the recent IEA and UN IPCC reports urging significant reductions in petroleum developments globally. Proponents of the field however argue that oil and gas remain vital to UK energy security as it transitions to net-zero; an argument that has been bolstered by the dynamics of the energy industry since the commencement of the Russia-Ukraine war and the resulting geopolitical fallouts and supply chain disruptions. This paper examines the commercial viability of the Cambo field to make an economic and policy case for its development. I recommend that owing to its high economic viability and low carbon intensity, the UK Government should consider approving the application for consent to develop the field, contingent on a stringent carbon emissions reduction programme for the field being implemented. This recommendation is consistent with a ‘just’ approach to energy transition, as well as the UK’s policy of maximising economic recovery (MER) from the wider UKCS sector.

KW - Cambo

KW - UKCS

KW - Economic

KW - Policy

KW - Energy Transition

KW - MER

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85140326959

U2 - 10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.103070

DO - 10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.103070

M3 - Article

VL - 79

JO - Resources Policy

JF - Resources Policy

M1 - 103070

ER -

An Economic and Policy Case for Development of the Controversial Cambo Field in the UK Continental Shelf

Abstract

Bibliographical note

UN SDGs

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this