Assessing the Incremental Algorithm: a Response to Krahmer et al

Kees van Deemter, Albert Gatt, Ielka van der Sluis, Richard Power

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)


This response discusses the experiment reported in Krahmer et al.'s Letter to the Editor of Cognitive Science. WE observe that their results do not tell us whether the Incremental Algorithm is better or worse than its competitors, and we speculate about implications for reference in complex domains, and for learning from "normal" (i.e., non-semantically-balanced) corpora.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)842-845
Number of pages4
JournalCognitive Science
Issue number5
Early online date1 Jun 2012
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2012


  • reference production
  • evaluation experiments
  • Letter to the Editor


Dive into the research topics of 'Assessing the Incremental Algorithm: a Response to Krahmer et al'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this