Abstract
Although he criticized Barth under the enigmatic phrase “positivism of revelation,” Bonhoeffer saw Barth’s criticism of religion as “his really great merit.” In the present age in which inter-faith dialogue has become more pressing than it has perhaps ever before been, theology can at times engage in two conversations that are not only separate but at worst self-contradictory: in its discussions with secular society, theology can engage in critical discussions about religion, drinking deeply from the well of criticism offered by the likes of Feuerbach, Nietzsche, Durkheim, and Marx; yet, in its discussions in inter-faith settings, the danger can arise that these critiques are thrown out altogether or at least lie in abeyance.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 75-94 |
| Number of pages | 20 |
| Journal | The Journal of Religion |
| Volume | 88 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jan 2008 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Bringing Barth’s Critique of Religion to the Inter‐faith Table'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS