Can asthma control be improved by understanding the patient's perspective?

Rob Horne, David Price* (Corresponding Author), Jen Cleland, Rui Costa, Donna Covey, Kevin Gruffydd-Jones, John Andrew Francis Haughney, Svein Hoegh Henrichsen, Alan Kaplan, Arnulf Langhammer, Anders Ostrem, Michael David Thomas, Thys Van Der Molen, J. Christian Virchow, Siân Williams

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialpeer-review

177 Citations (Scopus)
5 Downloads (Pure)


Clinical trials show that asthma can be controlled in the majority of patients, but poorly controlled asthma still imposes a considerable burden. The level of asthma control achieved reflects the behaviour of both healthcare professionals and patients. A key challenge for healthcare professionals is to help patients to engage in self-management behaviours with optimal adherence to appropriate treatment. These issues are particularly relevant in primary care, where most asthma is managed. An international panel of experts invited by the International Primary Care Respiratory Group considered the evidence and discussed the implications for primary care practice.

Causes of poor control Clinical factors such as exposure to triggers and concomitant rhinitis are important but so are patient behavioural factors. Behaviours such as smoking and nonadherence may reduce the efficacy of treatment and patients' perceptions influence these behaviours. Perceptual barriers to adherence include doubting the need for treatment when symptoms are absent and concerns about potential adverse effects. Under-treatment may also be related to patients' underestimation of the significance of symptoms, and lack of awareness of achievable control.


Three key implications for healthcare professionals emerged from the debate. First, the need for simple tools to assess asthma control. Two approaches considered were the monitoring of biometric markers of control and questionnaires to record patient-reported outcomes. Second, to understand the reasons for poor control for individual patients, identifying both clinical (e.g. rhinitis) and behavioural factors (e.g. smoking and nonadherence to treatment). Third was the need to incorporate, within asthma review, an assessment of patient perspectives including their goals and aspirations and to elicit their beliefs and concerns about asthma and its treatment. This can be used as a basis for agreement between the healthcare professional and patient on a predefined target regarding asthma control and a treatment plan to achieve this.

Optimum review of asthma is essential to improve control. A key priority is the development of simple and effective tools for identifying poor control for individual patients coupled with a tailored approach to treatment to enable patients to set and achieve realistic goals for asthma control.
Original languageEnglish
Article number8
Number of pages11
JournalBMC Pulmonary Medicine
Publication statusPublished - 22 May 2007

Bibliographical note

A medical writer, Dr Diane Storey, attended the discussion and produced the first draft of the manuscript. The IPCRG invited the participants, organised the discussion and contracted the medical writer, with expenses covered by an unrestricted educational grant from GlaxoSmithKline


Dive into the research topics of 'Can asthma control be improved by understanding the patient's perspective?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this