@inbook{6f75c1ee626743f089f0df3d966a57ef,
title = "Concluding Remarks: Seemings and Epistemic Justification",
abstract = "In this chapter I draw the conclusions of my investigation into phenomenal conservatism. I argue that phenomenal conservatism isn{\textquoteright}t actually plagued by serious problems attributed to it by its opponents, but that it neither possesses all the epistemic merits that its advocates think it has. I suggest that phenomenal conservatism could provide a more satisfactory account of everyday epistemic practices and a more robust response to the sceptic if it were integrated with a theory of inferential justification. I also identify questions and issues relevant to the assessment of phenomenal conservatism to be investigated in further research.",
keywords = "Foundationalism, Global ambitions of phenomenal conservatism, Inferential and non-inferential justification, Phenomenal conservatism, Reflective justification, Scepticism",
author = "Luca Moretti",
year = "2020",
month = mar,
day = "10",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-030-43392-5_6",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-3-030-43391-8",
series = "SpringerBriefs in Philosophy",
publisher = "Springer Science and Business Media B.V.",
pages = "89--91",
booktitle = "Seemings and Epistemic Justification",
}