Conservative treatment for urinary incontinence in Men After Prostate Surgery (MAPS): two parallel randomised controlled trials

C M A Glazener; C Boachie; B Buckley; C Cochran; G Dorey; A Grant; S Hagen; M Kilonzo; A McDonald; G McPherson; K Moore; J N'Dow; J D T Norrie; C Ramsay; L Vale

doi:10.3310/hta15240

Conservative treatment for urinary incontinence in Men After Prostate Surgery (MAPS): two parallel randomised controlled trials

C M A Glazener, C Boachie, B Buckley, C Cochran, G Dorey, A Grant, S Hagen, M Kilonzo, A McDonald, G McPherson, K Moore, J N'Dow, J D T Norrie, C Ramsay, L Vale

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

43 Citations (Scopus)

25 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

To determine the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of active conservative treatment, compared with standard management, in regaining urinary continence at 12 months in men with urinary incontinence at 6 weeks after a radical prostatectomy or a transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP).

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	1-290
Number of pages	290
Journal	Health Technology Assessment
Volume	15
Issue number	24
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.3310/hta15240
Publication status	Published - Jun 2011

Keywords

aged
cost-benefit analysis
erectile dysfunction
exercise therapy
humans
male
middle aged
pelvic floor
prostatectomy
prostatic neoplasms
quality-adjusted life years
socioeconomic factors
standard of care
transurethral resection of prostate
urinary incontinence

Access to Document

10.3310/hta15240Licence: Unspecified

Final PDF
Glazener, CMA, Boachie, C, Buckley, B, Cochran, C, Dorey, G, Grant, AM, Hagen, S, Kilonzo, M, McDonald, AM, McPherson, G, Moore, K, N'Dow, J, Norrie, J, Ramsay, C & Vale, L 2011, 'Conservative treatment for urinary incontinence in Men After Prostate Surgery (MAPS): two parallel randomised controlled trials', Health Technology Assessment, vol 15, no. 24, pp. 1-290, iii-iv. DOI: 10.3310/hta15240
Final published version, 3.81 MBLicence: Unspecified

Cite this

Glazener, C. M. A., Boachie, C., Buckley, B., Cochran, C., Dorey, G., Grant, A., Hagen, S., Kilonzo, M., McDonald, A., McPherson, G., Moore, K., N'Dow, J., Norrie, J. D. T., Ramsay, C., & Vale, L. (2011). Conservative treatment for urinary incontinence in Men After Prostate Surgery (MAPS): two parallel randomised controlled trials. Health Technology Assessment, 15(24), 1-290. https://doi.org/10.3310/hta15240

Glazener, CMA, Boachie, C, Buckley, B, Cochran, C, Dorey, G, Grant, A, Hagen, S, Kilonzo, M, McDonald, A, McPherson, G, Moore, K, N'Dow, J, Norrie, JDT, Ramsay, C & Vale, L 2011, 'Conservative treatment for urinary incontinence in Men After Prostate Surgery (MAPS): two parallel randomised controlled trials', Health Technology Assessment, vol. 15, no. 24, pp. 1-290. https://doi.org/10.3310/hta15240

@article{710168f4e4bd4d4fb407be51dc2b66fd,

title = "Conservative treatment for urinary incontinence in Men After Prostate Surgery (MAPS): two parallel randomised controlled trials",

abstract = "To determine the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of active conservative treatment, compared with standard management, in regaining urinary continence at 12 months in men with urinary incontinence at 6 weeks after a radical prostatectomy or a transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP).",

keywords = "aged, cost-benefit analysis, erectile dysfunction, exercise therapy, humans, male, middle aged, pelvic floor, prostatectomy, prostatic neoplasms, quality-adjusted life years, socioeconomic factors, standard of care, transurethral resection of prostate, urinary incontinence",

author = "Glazener, {C M A} and C Boachie and B Buckley and C Cochran and G Dorey and A Grant and S Hagen and M Kilonzo and A McDonald and G McPherson and K Moore and J N'Dow and Norrie, {J D T} and C Ramsay and L Vale",

year = "2011",

month = jun,

doi = "10.3310/hta15240",

language = "English",

volume = "15",

pages = "1--290",

journal = "Health Technology Assessment",

issn = "2046-4924",

publisher = "National Co-ordinating Centre for HTA",

number = "24",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Conservative treatment for urinary incontinence in Men After Prostate Surgery (MAPS)

T2 - two parallel randomised controlled trials

AU - Glazener, C M A

AU - Boachie, C

AU - Buckley, B

AU - Cochran, C

AU - Dorey, G

AU - Grant, A

AU - Hagen, S

AU - Kilonzo, M

AU - McDonald, A

AU - McPherson, G

AU - Moore, K

AU - N'Dow, J

AU - Norrie, J D T

AU - Ramsay, C

AU - Vale, L

PY - 2011/6

Y1 - 2011/6

N2 - To determine the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of active conservative treatment, compared with standard management, in regaining urinary continence at 12 months in men with urinary incontinence at 6 weeks after a radical prostatectomy or a transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP).

AB - To determine the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of active conservative treatment, compared with standard management, in regaining urinary continence at 12 months in men with urinary incontinence at 6 weeks after a radical prostatectomy or a transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP).

KW - aged

KW - cost-benefit analysis

KW - erectile dysfunction

KW - exercise therapy

KW - humans

KW - male

KW - middle aged

KW - pelvic floor

KW - prostatectomy

KW - prostatic neoplasms

KW - quality-adjusted life years

KW - socioeconomic factors

KW - standard of care

KW - transurethral resection of prostate

KW - urinary incontinence

U2 - 10.3310/hta15240

DO - 10.3310/hta15240

M3 - Article

C2 - 21640056

SN - 2046-4924

VL - 15

SP - 1

EP - 290

JO - Health Technology Assessment

JF - Health Technology Assessment

IS - 24

ER -

Conservative treatment for urinary incontinence in Men After Prostate Surgery (MAPS): two parallel randomised controlled trials

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this