Abstract
This chapter focuses on the development of corporate human rights standards since the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, better known as the Earth Summit was held in Rio de Janeiro in 1992. One of the important agendas for this Summit was human rights (apart from the climate change issue). This chapter provides a critical evaluation of institutional change in human rights guidelines and associated corporate (non) accountability in relation to human rights in line with the RIO summit. Based on a review of the media reports, archival documents and a case study, we argue that while there are a number of international organisations working towards the creation of corporate accountability in relation to human rights, there is limited real change in corporate action when faced with no government regulation. A radical (reform-based) approach, such as mandatory monitoring (compliance audit) and disclosure requirements is necessary to ensure corporate accountability in relation to human rights.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Sustainability after Rio |
| Editors | David Crowther, Muhammad Azizul Islam |
| Publisher | Emerald Group Publishing Limited |
| Pages | 161-183 |
| Number of pages | 23 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 978-1-78560-444-7 |
| ISBN (Print) | 978-1-78560-445-4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2015 |
Publication series
| Name | Developments in Corporate Governance and Responsibility |
|---|---|
| Volume | 8 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 13 Climate Action
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Corporate accountability in relation to human rights: Have RIOs done enough?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS