Defining Argumentation Attacks in Practice: An Experiment in Food Packaging Consumer Expectations

Bruno Yun, Rallou Thomopoulos*, Pierre Bisquert, Madalina Croitoru

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingPublished conference contribution

5 Citations (Scopus)


In socio-economic systems, where actors are motivated by different objectives, interests and priorities, it is very difficult to meet all involved party expectations when proposing new solutions. Argumentative approaches have been proposed and demonstrated to be of added value when addressing such decision making problems. In this paper we focus on the following research question: “How to define an attack relation for argumentative decision making in socio-economic systems?” To address this question we propose three kinds of attacks that could be defined in the context of a precise application (packaging selection) and see how the non computer science experts evaluate, against a given set of decision tasks, each of these attacks.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationGraph-Based Representation and Reasoning
Subtitle of host publicationProceedings of 23rd International Conference on Conceptual Structures, ICCS 2018
EditorsPeter Chapman, Dominik Endres, Nathalie Pernelle
Number of pages15
ISBN (Electronic)978-3-319-91379-7
ISBN (Print)978-3-319-91378-0
Publication statusPublished - 2018
EventInternational Conference on Conceptual Structures - Marburg, Germany
Duration: 1 Jul 20194 Jul 2019

Publication series

NameLecture Notes in Computer Science
ISSN (Print)0302-9743


ConferenceInternational Conference on Conceptual Structures
Abbreviated titleICCS 2019


Dive into the research topics of 'Defining Argumentation Attacks in Practice: An Experiment in Food Packaging Consumer Expectations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this