Abstract
Objectives
This systematic review intended to assess the effectiveness of financial support interventions for household fuel poverty in the UK in terms of reducing adverse impacts on the health and wellbeing of recipients.
Methods
Bibliographic databases and grey literature sources were searched from the UK for studies that evaluated the health and wellbeing of participants following financial support to optimize indoor heating. Two independent reviewers carried out screening, data extraction and quality assessment of the articles. The outcomes included direct health-related outcomes such as Excess Winter Mortality (EWM), physical/mental health, health services utilization, well-being, and quality of life. Indirect health related outcomes included temperature, condensation/mould/dampness (CMD), fuel efficiency/expenditure and satisfaction with warmth. Due to the heterogeneity of interventions and outcomes, a narrative synthesis of the data was carried out.
Results
Twenty studies were included in the review: randomized controlled trials (n=1), before and after evaluation of interventions (n=14), ecological studies (n=1) and modelling studies (n=4). Sixteen studies assessed impacts of home energy efficiency improvements (HEEI) only, three studies assessed impacts of Winter Fuel Payment (WFP) only while one study assessed impacts of both HEEI and WFP. HEEI studies reported improved indoor temperatures (n=4), reduced CMD (n=6), reduced fuel expenditure (n=4), improved thermal comfort (n=7), improvements in general health (n=4), increased wellbeing (n=4), improved physical health (n=2), improved mental health (n=3), reduced new health events (n=1) and improved existing medical conditions (n=2). Two HEEI were reported cost effective with added years to life. During modelling studies WFP was found to significantly reduce EWM (n=2) and fibrinogen levels (n=1).
Conclusions
Most financial support interventions included in this review demonstrated positive impacts on health and wellbeing of recipients supporting their implementation with robust evaluations to better understand the cost effectiveness and long-term impacts in the future. Implementation of these interventions will require cross-sector collaborations, with consideration of which populations are most likely to benefit.
This systematic review intended to assess the effectiveness of financial support interventions for household fuel poverty in the UK in terms of reducing adverse impacts on the health and wellbeing of recipients.
Methods
Bibliographic databases and grey literature sources were searched from the UK for studies that evaluated the health and wellbeing of participants following financial support to optimize indoor heating. Two independent reviewers carried out screening, data extraction and quality assessment of the articles. The outcomes included direct health-related outcomes such as Excess Winter Mortality (EWM), physical/mental health, health services utilization, well-being, and quality of life. Indirect health related outcomes included temperature, condensation/mould/dampness (CMD), fuel efficiency/expenditure and satisfaction with warmth. Due to the heterogeneity of interventions and outcomes, a narrative synthesis of the data was carried out.
Results
Twenty studies were included in the review: randomized controlled trials (n=1), before and after evaluation of interventions (n=14), ecological studies (n=1) and modelling studies (n=4). Sixteen studies assessed impacts of home energy efficiency improvements (HEEI) only, three studies assessed impacts of Winter Fuel Payment (WFP) only while one study assessed impacts of both HEEI and WFP. HEEI studies reported improved indoor temperatures (n=4), reduced CMD (n=6), reduced fuel expenditure (n=4), improved thermal comfort (n=7), improvements in general health (n=4), increased wellbeing (n=4), improved physical health (n=2), improved mental health (n=3), reduced new health events (n=1) and improved existing medical conditions (n=2). Two HEEI were reported cost effective with added years to life. During modelling studies WFP was found to significantly reduce EWM (n=2) and fibrinogen levels (n=1).
Conclusions
Most financial support interventions included in this review demonstrated positive impacts on health and wellbeing of recipients supporting their implementation with robust evaluations to better understand the cost effectiveness and long-term impacts in the future. Implementation of these interventions will require cross-sector collaborations, with consideration of which populations are most likely to benefit.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1-10 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | Public Health in Practice |
Volume | 7 |
Early online date | 10 May 2024 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 7 Jun 2024 |
Bibliographical note
We would like to acknowledge the support extended by the Aberdeen Center for Health Data Sciences, University of Aberdeen and Directorate of Public Health, NHS Grampian, Scotland and Aberdeen Health Determinants Research Collaborative, Scotland.Data Availability Statement
No data availability statement.Keywords
- health effects of energy poverty
- energy efficiency interventions
- winter fuel payment
- warm homes
- excess winter mortality
- health
- and wellbeing