Abstract
Background: There are concerns that chlorhexidine skin decolonisation may select multidrug resistant pathogens. We evaluated the effects of de-escalating from universal to targeted chlorhexidine decolonisation on Staphylococcus epidermidis bloodstream infections (SE-BSI).
Methods: We did a retrospective before-after control-impact time-series analysis and longitudinal genotypic study in two ICUs in Scotland. Participants were adults ≥16 years admitted between Jul 1, 2009, and Feb 28, 2022. In ICU1 (intervention site) universal decolonisation in all admissions was de-escalated to targeted decolonisation of high-risk MRSA carriers on Feb 1, 2019, while in ICU2 (control site) targeted decolonisation was applied throughout. We used multilocus sequence typing to identify sequence types (ST) from SE-BSI episodes. Whole genome sequencing was applied to a random sample from ICU1. The primary outcomes were i) all BSI incidence density, ii) MRSE incidence density, iii) probability that SE-BSI were meticillin-resistant. The effects of de-escalation on MRSE in ICU1 were estimated by differences between the intervention and control sites, before and after de-escalation.
Findings: There was no increase in all BSI incidence coinciding with de-escalation in ICU1. MRSE incidence during universal decolonisation increased more rapidly in ICU1 [2·3 (95% credible interval 1·4-3·5) and 10·9 (CI 7·2-15·4) MRSE cases per 1000 OBDs at the beginning of the study and immediately before de-escalation], compared to ICU2 [1·3 (CI 0·6-2·4) and 5·3 (CI 2·9-8·7) MRSE cases per 1000 OBDs]. De-escalation was associated with reduced MRSE due to epidemic multidrug resistant sequence types, increased susceptibility to chlorhexidine and reduced carriage of mobile genetic elements and genes for multidrug resistance and biofilm production.
Interpretation: In low MRSA incidence settings, de-escalation from universal to targeted chlorhexidine decolonisation may reduce selection of multidrug resistant S. epidermidis. ICU decolonisation practices should balance risks and benefits of biocide use and be informed by surveillance of sentinel infections.
Methods: We did a retrospective before-after control-impact time-series analysis and longitudinal genotypic study in two ICUs in Scotland. Participants were adults ≥16 years admitted between Jul 1, 2009, and Feb 28, 2022. In ICU1 (intervention site) universal decolonisation in all admissions was de-escalated to targeted decolonisation of high-risk MRSA carriers on Feb 1, 2019, while in ICU2 (control site) targeted decolonisation was applied throughout. We used multilocus sequence typing to identify sequence types (ST) from SE-BSI episodes. Whole genome sequencing was applied to a random sample from ICU1. The primary outcomes were i) all BSI incidence density, ii) MRSE incidence density, iii) probability that SE-BSI were meticillin-resistant. The effects of de-escalation on MRSE in ICU1 were estimated by differences between the intervention and control sites, before and after de-escalation.
Findings: There was no increase in all BSI incidence coinciding with de-escalation in ICU1. MRSE incidence during universal decolonisation increased more rapidly in ICU1 [2·3 (95% credible interval 1·4-3·5) and 10·9 (CI 7·2-15·4) MRSE cases per 1000 OBDs at the beginning of the study and immediately before de-escalation], compared to ICU2 [1·3 (CI 0·6-2·4) and 5·3 (CI 2·9-8·7) MRSE cases per 1000 OBDs]. De-escalation was associated with reduced MRSE due to epidemic multidrug resistant sequence types, increased susceptibility to chlorhexidine and reduced carriage of mobile genetic elements and genes for multidrug resistance and biofilm production.
Interpretation: In low MRSA incidence settings, de-escalation from universal to targeted chlorhexidine decolonisation may reduce selection of multidrug resistant S. epidermidis. ICU decolonisation practices should balance risks and benefits of biocide use and be informed by surveillance of sentinel infections.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Publisher | SSRN |
| Number of pages | 36 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 13 Aug 2024 |
Publication series
| Name | SSRN Preprints with The Lancet |
|---|---|
| ISSN (Electronic) | 1556-5068 |
Bibliographical note
AckowledgementsWe are indebted to Professor Ian M Gould for his critical input and invaluable expertise throughout the study. We thank the administrative and laboratory staff of the NHS Grampian and Tayside Medical Microbiology laboratories for assistance with isolate collection and anonymisation. We thank Dr Hadeel Abbood for assistance with review of existing literature and evidence. We thank Dr Elaina Collie-Duguid and the Aberdeen Centre of Genome-Enabled Biology and Medicine for their critical input and contribution to quality assurance of the genome data. This study was funded by the National Health Service Grampian Charity (grant numbers EA2771, EA2119 and EA9125).
Data Sharing
The genome data of the newly sequenced isolates for this study will be available via NCBI GenBank with publication of this Article (Bioproject unique identifier PRJNA982045). Isolate metadata has been included in the Supplementary Table 2 of this Article. R codes will be available on publication at https://github.com/DeonRoos/002---AntiRes. Requests for anonymised datasets can be made by contacting the corresponding author.
Funding
This study was funded by the National Health Service Grampian Charity (grant numbers EA2771, EA2119 and EA9125).
| Funders | Funder number |
|---|---|
| National Health Service Grampian Charities | EA2771, EA2119, EA9125 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Effects of universal versus targeted chlorhexidine skin decolonisation on the clinical and molecular epidemiology of Staphylococcus epidermidis bloodstream infections in intensive care: a controlled time-series and longitudinal genomic study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS