Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Empathy and transformative experience without the first person point of view (a reply to L. A. Paul)1

  • Herman Cappelen* (Corresponding Author)
  • , Josh Dever
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

In her very interesting ‘First-personal modes of presentation and the problem of empathy’ (2017, 315–336), L. A. Paul argues that the phenomenon of empathy gives us reason to care about the first person point of view: that as theorists we can only understand, and as humans only evince, empathy by appealing to that point of view. We are skeptics about the importance of the first person point of view, although not about empathy. The goal of this paper is to see if we can account for empathy without the ideology of the first person. We conclude that we can.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)315-336
Number of pages22
JournalInquiry
Volume60
Issue number3
Early online date9 Dec 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • de se
  • Empathy
  • first person perspective
  • tranformative experience

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Empathy and transformative experience without the first person point of view (a reply to L. A. Paul)1'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this