Abstract
In her very interesting ‘First-personal modes of presentation and the problem of empathy’ (2017, 315–336), L. A. Paul argues that the phenomenon of empathy gives us reason to care about the first person point of view: that as theorists we can only understand, and as humans only evince, empathy by appealing to that point of view. We are skeptics about the importance of the first person point of view, although not about empathy. The goal of this paper is to see if we can account for empathy without the ideology of the first person. We conclude that we can.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 315-336 |
| Number of pages | 22 |
| Journal | Inquiry |
| Volume | 60 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Early online date | 9 Dec 2016 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2017 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- de se
- Empathy
- first person perspective
- tranformative experience
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Empathy and transformative experience without the first person point of view (a reply to L. A. Paul)1'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS