Evaluation and stages of surgical innovations

Jeffrey S Barkun; Jeffrey K Aronson; Liane S Feldman; Guy J Maddern; Steven M Strasberg; Douglas G Altman; Jeffrey S Barkun; Jane M Blazeby; Isabell C Boutron; Steven Bruce Campbell; Pierre-Alain Clavien; Jonathan A Cook; Patrick L Ergina; David R Flum; Paul Glasziou; John Marshall; Peter McCulloch; Jon Nicholl; Bournaby C Reeves; Christoph M Seiler; Jonathan L Meakins; Deborah Ashby; Nick Black; John Bunker; Martin Burton; Marion K Campbell; Kalipso Chalkidou; Iain Chalmers; Marc de Leval; Jon Deeks; Adrian M Grant; Muir Gray; Roger Greenhalgh; Milos Jenicek; Sean Kehoe; Richard Lilford; Peter Littlejohns; Yoon Loke; Rajan Madhock; Donald Kirk McPherson; Peter Rothwell; Bill Summerskill; David Taggart; Parris Tekkis; Mandy Thompson; Tom Treasure; Ulrich Trohler; Jan Vandenbroucke; Balliol Collaboration

doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61083-7

Evaluation and stages of surgical innovations

Jeffrey S Barkun
, Jeffrey K Aronson
, Liane S Feldman
, Guy J Maddern
, Steven M Strasberg
, Douglas G Altman
, Jeffrey S Barkun
, Jane M Blazeby
, Isabell C Boutron
, Steven Bruce Campbell
, Pierre-Alain Clavien
, Jonathan A Cook
, Patrick L Ergina
, David R Flum
, Paul Glasziou
, John Marshall
, Peter McCulloch
, Jon Nicholl
, Bournaby C Reeves
, Christoph M Seiler

Jonathan L Meakins, Deborah Ashby, Nick Black, John Bunker, Martin Burton, Marion K Campbell, Kalipso Chalkidou, Iain Chalmers, Marc de Leval, Jon Deeks, Adrian M Grant, Muir Gray, Roger Greenhalgh, Milos Jenicek, Sean Kehoe, Richard Lilford, Peter Littlejohns, Yoon Loke, Rajan Madhock, Donald Kirk McPherson, Peter Rothwell, Bill Summerskill, David Taggart, Parris Tekkis, Mandy Thompson, Tom Treasure, Ulrich Trohler, Jan Vandenbroucke, Balliol Collaboration

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

487 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Surgical innovation is an important part of surgical practice. Its assessment is complex because of idiosyncrasies related to surgical practice, but necessary so that introduction and adoption of surgical innovations can derive from evidence-based principles rather than trial and error. A regulatory framework is also desirable to protect patients against the potential harms of any novel procedure. In this first of three Series papers on surgical innovation and evaluation, we propose a five-stage paradigm to describe the development of innovative surgical procedures.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	1089-1096
Number of pages	8
Journal	The Lancet
Volume	374
Issue number	9695
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61083-7
Publication status	Published - 26 Sept 2009

Keywords

biomedical research
diffusion of innovation
evaluation studies as topic
evidence-based medicine
humans
surgical procedures, operative
technology assessment, biomedical

Access to Document

10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61083-7

Cite this

Barkun, J. S., Aronson, J. K., Feldman, L. S., Maddern, G. J., Strasberg, S. M., Altman, D. G., Barkun, J. S., Blazeby, J. M., Boutron, I. C., Campbell, S. B., Clavien, P.-A., Cook, J. A., Ergina, P. L., Flum, D. R., Glasziou, P., Marshall, J., McCulloch, P., Nicholl, J., Reeves, B. C., ... Balliol Collaboration (2009). Evaluation and stages of surgical innovations. The Lancet, 374(9695), 1089-1096. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61083-7

Barkun, JS, Aronson, JK, Feldman, LS, Maddern, GJ, Strasberg, SM, Altman, DG, Barkun, JS, Blazeby, JM, Boutron, IC, Campbell, SB, Clavien, P-A, Cook, JA, Ergina, PL, Flum, DR, Glasziou, P, Marshall, J, McCulloch, P, Nicholl, J, Reeves, BC, Seiler, CM, Meakins, JL, Ashby, D, Black, N, Bunker, J, Burton, M, Campbell, MK, Chalkidou, K, Chalmers, I, de Leval, M, Deeks, J, Grant, AM, Gray, M, Greenhalgh, R, Jenicek, M, Kehoe, S, Lilford, R, Littlejohns, P, Loke, Y, Madhock, R, McPherson, DK, Rothwell, P, Summerskill, B, Taggart, D, Tekkis, P, Thompson, M, Treasure, T, Trohler, U, Vandenbroucke, J & Balliol Collaboration 2009, 'Evaluation and stages of surgical innovations', The Lancet, vol. 374, no. 9695, pp. 1089-1096. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61083-7

@article{26572945f7744b8d8db95e559c687fae,

title = "Evaluation and stages of surgical innovations",

abstract = "Surgical innovation is an important part of surgical practice. Its assessment is complex because of idiosyncrasies related to surgical practice, but necessary so that introduction and adoption of surgical innovations can derive from evidence-based principles rather than trial and error. A regulatory framework is also desirable to protect patients against the potential harms of any novel procedure. In this first of three Series papers on surgical innovation and evaluation, we propose a five-stage paradigm to describe the development of innovative surgical procedures.",

keywords = "biomedical research, diffusion of innovation, evaluation studies as topic, evidence-based medicine, humans, surgical procedures, operative, technology assessment, biomedical",

author = "Barkun, \{Jeffrey S\} and Aronson, \{Jeffrey K\} and Feldman, \{Liane S\} and Maddern, \{Guy J\} and Strasberg, \{Steven M\} and Altman, \{Douglas G\} and Barkun, \{Jeffrey S\} and Blazeby, \{Jane M\} and Boutron, \{Isabell C\} and Campbell, \{Steven Bruce\} and Pierre-Alain Clavien and Cook, \{Jonathan A\} and Ergina, \{Patrick L\} and Flum, \{David R\} and Paul Glasziou and John Marshall and Peter McCulloch and Jon Nicholl and Reeves, \{Bournaby C\} and Seiler, \{Christoph M\} and Meakins, \{Jonathan L\} and Deborah Ashby and Nick Black and John Bunker and Martin Burton and Campbell, \{Marion K\} and Kalipso Chalkidou and Iain Chalmers and \{de Leval\}, Marc and Jon Deeks and Grant, \{Adrian M\} and Muir Gray and Roger Greenhalgh and Milos Jenicek and Sean Kehoe and Richard Lilford and Peter Littlejohns and Yoon Loke and Rajan Madhock and McPherson, \{Donald Kirk\} and Peter Rothwell and Bill Summerskill and David Taggart and Parris Tekkis and Mandy Thompson and Tom Treasure and Ulrich Trohler and Jan Vandenbroucke and \{Balliol Collaboration\}",

year = "2009",

month = sep,

day = "26",

doi = "10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61083-7",

language = "English",

volume = "374",

pages = "1089--1096",

journal = "The Lancet",

issn = "0140-6736",

publisher = "Elsevier BV",

number = "9695",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation and stages of surgical innovations

AU - Barkun, Jeffrey S

AU - Aronson, Jeffrey K

AU - Feldman, Liane S

AU - Maddern, Guy J

AU - Strasberg, Steven M

AU - Altman, Douglas G

AU - Barkun, Jeffrey S

AU - Blazeby, Jane M

AU - Boutron, Isabell C

AU - Campbell, Steven Bruce

AU - Clavien, Pierre-Alain

AU - Cook, Jonathan A

AU - Ergina, Patrick L

AU - Flum, David R

AU - Glasziou, Paul

AU - Marshall, John

AU - McCulloch, Peter

AU - Nicholl, Jon

AU - Reeves, Bournaby C

AU - Seiler, Christoph M

AU - Meakins, Jonathan L

AU - Ashby, Deborah

AU - Black, Nick

AU - Bunker, John

AU - Burton, Martin

AU - Campbell, Marion K

AU - Chalkidou, Kalipso

AU - Chalmers, Iain

AU - de Leval, Marc

AU - Deeks, Jon

AU - Grant, Adrian M

AU - Gray, Muir

AU - Greenhalgh, Roger

AU - Jenicek, Milos

AU - Kehoe, Sean

AU - Lilford, Richard

AU - Littlejohns, Peter

AU - Loke, Yoon

AU - Madhock, Rajan

AU - McPherson, Donald Kirk

AU - Rothwell, Peter

AU - Summerskill, Bill

AU - Taggart, David

AU - Tekkis, Parris

AU - Thompson, Mandy

AU - Treasure, Tom

AU - Trohler, Ulrich

AU - Vandenbroucke, Jan

AU - Balliol Collaboration

PY - 2009/9/26

Y1 - 2009/9/26

N2 - Surgical innovation is an important part of surgical practice. Its assessment is complex because of idiosyncrasies related to surgical practice, but necessary so that introduction and adoption of surgical innovations can derive from evidence-based principles rather than trial and error. A regulatory framework is also desirable to protect patients against the potential harms of any novel procedure. In this first of three Series papers on surgical innovation and evaluation, we propose a five-stage paradigm to describe the development of innovative surgical procedures.

AB - Surgical innovation is an important part of surgical practice. Its assessment is complex because of idiosyncrasies related to surgical practice, but necessary so that introduction and adoption of surgical innovations can derive from evidence-based principles rather than trial and error. A regulatory framework is also desirable to protect patients against the potential harms of any novel procedure. In this first of three Series papers on surgical innovation and evaluation, we propose a five-stage paradigm to describe the development of innovative surgical procedures.

KW - biomedical research

KW - diffusion of innovation

KW - evaluation studies as topic

KW - evidence-based medicine

KW - humans

KW - surgical procedures, operative

KW - technology assessment, biomedical

U2 - 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61083-7

DO - 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61083-7

M3 - Article

C2 - 19782874

SN - 0140-6736

VL - 374

SP - 1089

EP - 1096

JO - The Lancet

JF - The Lancet

IS - 9695

ER -

Evaluation and stages of surgical innovations

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this