Abstract
A general trend in recent philosophical and empirical work aims to undermine various traditional claims regarding the distinctive nature of self-knowledge. So far, however, this work has not seriously threatened the Cartesian claim that (at least some) self-knowledge is immune to the sort of sceptical problem that seems to afflict our knowledge of the external world. In this paper I carry this trend further by arguing that the Cartesian claim is false. This is done by showing that a familiar sceptical argument that targets my knowledge of the external world can be adapted to target my belief that I exist, along with any of my self-knowledge that I know entails my own existence. Thus, my self-knowledge and my knowledge of the external world are subject to the same sort of sceptical problem.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 591-607 |
Number of pages | 16 |
Journal | Philosophical Studies |
Volume | 180 |
Early online date | 7 Jan 2023 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Feb 2023 |