Abstract
This article develops a new understanding of the financial centre as a unit of analysis. It draws on Pierre Bourdieu’s generative structuralism to argue that financial centres constitute fields that possess a distinctive habitus through which risk is judged. Furthermore, Douglass North’s New Institutional Economics is used to argue that this distinctive habitus is the product of a combination of "hard" and "soft" forces: economic and business structures, the role of states, social networks, and cultural factors. It pushes beyond a simple geographical understanding of the financial centre while asserting that the financial centre is indeed a critical level of analysis. Moreover, the approach taken strongly suggests the need for historians of finance to incorporate broader macro-level political, economic, social and cultural developments into their analyses.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Decision Taking, Confidence and Risk Management in Banks from Early Modernity to the 20th Century |
| Editors | Korinna Schönhärl |
| Place of Publication | Basingstoke |
| Publisher | Palgrave Macmillan |
| Pages | 125-145 |
| Number of pages | 21 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 978-3-319-42076-9 |
| ISBN (Print) | 978-3-319-42075-2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 27 Jan 2017 |
Publication series
| Name | Palgrave Studies in the History of Finance |
|---|---|
| Publisher | Palgrave macmillan |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Financial centres as fields: Reflections on habitus and risk in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Profiles
-
Andrew Dilley
- School of Divinity, History & Philosophy, History - Senior Lecturer
- School of Divinity, History & Philosophy, Centre for Global Security and Governance
Person: Academic
Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS