Five-year follow-up of patients undergoing laparoscopic or open groin hernia repair

David Laird Wright, C. Paterson, Neil William Scott, P. J. O'Dwyer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

168 Citations (Scopus)


Objective To compare laparoscopic with open hernia repair in a randomized clinical trial at a median follow-up of 5 years.

Summary Background Data Follow-up of patients in clinical trials evaluating laparoscopic hernia repair has been short.

Methods Of 379 consecutive patients admitted for surgery under the care of one surgeon, 300 were randomized to totally extraperitoneal hernia repair or open repair, with the open operation individualized to the patient's age and hernia type. All patients, both randomized and nonrandomized, were followed up by clinical examination annually by an independent observer.

Results Recurrence rates were similar for both randomized groups. In 1 of the 79 nonrandomized patients, a recurrent hernia developed. Groin or testicular pain was the most common symptom on follow-up of randomized patients. The most common reason for reoperation was development of a contralateral hernia, which was noted in 9% of patients; 11% of all patients died on follow-up, mainly as a result of cardiovascular disease or cancer.

Conclusions These data show a similar outcome for laparoscopic and open hernia repair, and both procedures have a place in managing this common problem.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)333-337
Number of pages4
JournalAnnals of Surgery
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2002


Dive into the research topics of 'Five-year follow-up of patients undergoing laparoscopic or open groin hernia repair'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this