G. W. Leibniz: Moderation and Censorship

  • Mogens Laerke

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

According to André Robinet, “the liberty of opinion, the liberty of conscience, in a word, the liberty to philosophize, mark the totality of Leibniz’s works and actions.”2 There are passages in Leibniz’s texts which could seem to speak quite clearly in favor of Robinet’s interpretation. For example, he wrote the following in two letters to Bartholomew des Bosses from 1707 concerning the persecutions of Jansenists in France: “Even if I do not approve of the main views of an author, I should like to have conceded to the learned [ . . . ] the freedom of philosophizing [philosophandi libertatem], which inspires competition and arouses intellects” and “it is extremely harmful that freedom of thinking [sentiendi libertatem] be restrained from day to day within unnecessary limits.”3 In certain particular cases, Leibniz was strongly opposed to censorship, for instance in= relation to the condemnation of Copernicus and Galileo. Thus, during his travels to Italy in the late 1690s, the German philosopher condemned the actions taken by the Roman Catholic Church against the astronomers...
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Use of Censorship in the Enlightenment
EditorsMogens Laerke
Place of PublicationLeiden, Germany
PublisherE.J. Brill
Pages155-178
Number of pages23
ISBN (Electronic)978-90-47-42902-9
ISBN (Print)900417558X, 978-90-04-17558-7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Jun 2009

Publication series

NameBrill's Studies in Intellectual History
PublisherE.J. Brill
Volume175

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'G. W. Leibniz: Moderation and Censorship'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this