General practice blood pressure recording in Scotland: Variations in the classification of hypertension

  • B. S. Henderson
  • , M. W. Taylor*
  • , R. M. Milne
  • , R. J. Taylor
  • , L. D. Ritchie
  • , A. Begg
  • , S. R. McEwan
  • , M. Irving
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

A questionnaire concerning blood pressure assessment, as part of health promotion activity, was circulated to all 770 Gpass practices in Scotland producing a 64.6% response rate. The results reveal a wide range in both the systolic and diastolic levels chosen to classify blood pressure as normal, borderline raised or raised. Practices are using a variety of values to indicate hypertension when considering systolic and, to a lesser extent, diastolic pressure. The variations found suggest that both over and under treatment are a significant risk to patients. The introduction of the 1993 health promotion regulations means that practices are required to actively target their practice population for blood pressure assessment and appropriate intervention. We suggest that this process will be enhanced if doctors are encouraged to adopt the established guidelines for the classification of blood pressure or general practice computer software is adapted to offer blood pressure protocol support.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)108-109
Number of pages2
JournalScottish Medical Journal
Volume41
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 1996

Keywords

  • Blood pressure assessment
  • Health promotion
  • Inconsistency in classification

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'General practice blood pressure recording in Scotland: Variations in the classification of hypertension'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this