Abstract
The desire to promote assisted dying is linked to concerns about living in a fast-paced world, dependence, pain, suffering, and uncertainty. Society must consider whether humans have a fundamental right to choose when and how to die. This debate involves medical doctors balancing their ethical duties with patient autonomy. Patients nearing the end of life and their families often face emotional and ethical dilemmas, which are often complicated by legal restrictions that limit decision-making. A legal framework for assisted dying is essential to balance patients’ rights and doctors’ duty to do no harm. These discussions prompt society to reflect on life, death, and personal choice, highlighting the need for ongoing dialogue and policy review to uphold the dignity of terminally ill adults at the end of their lives. The article explores the legal and ethical issues surrounding end-of-life decisions, focusing on proposed assisted dying legislation for terminally ill patients in Great Britain. It also emphasises the importance of patient autonomy in these decisions and assesses how the proposed legislations align with the fundamental right to human dignity. The article concludes by underscoring the importance of safeguards to prevent coercion and undue influence.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 7 |
| Pages (from-to) | 1-31 |
| Number of pages | 31 |
| Journal | Granite Journal: The University of Aberdeen Postgraduate Interdisciplinary Journal |
| Volume | 10 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 30 Sept 2025 |
Keywords
- autonomy
- capacity
- dignified death
- euthanasia
- assisted suicide