Abstract
The significant effects that inertia have on the performance of energy-absorbing materials and structures are illustrated using two examples. In the case of the inversion tube, the principal effect for a tube of uniform thickness is to generate an initial peak force in excess of the steady-state stage 3 force due to the phenomenon of `second impact'. The study of the dynamic crushing of aluminum honeycombs, on the other hand, confirms the sensitivity of the crushing stress of a cellular material to impact velocity.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 955-979 |
| Number of pages | 25 |
| Journal | International Journal of Impact Engineering |
| Volume | 22 |
| Issue number | 9 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jan 1999 |
Funding
The work outlined in this paper was supported financially by the DRA, Fort Halstead (project SMCFU/9) and by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) under grant GR/K18832. The authors would like to express their gratitude for this support.
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Inertia effects in impact energy absorbing materials and structures'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS