InS:PIRE - Evaluation of the scaling up of a quality improvement initiative: abridged report

Magdalena Rzewuska; Heather Morgan; Zoe Skea; John Norrie; Marion Campbell

InS:PIRE - Evaluation of the scaling up of a quality improvement initiative: abridged report

Magdalena Rzewuska, Heather Morgan, Zoe Skea, John Norrie, Marion Campbell^* (Corresponding Author)

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Book/Report › Other Report

51 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The evaluation of the Intensive Care Syndrome: Promoting Independence and Return to Employment (InS:PIRE) project was designed to help understand whether and how the scaling up of the programme achieved its stated aims and objectives. Of particular interest was identifying how the scaling up process was enacted – what the scaling up achieved (or did not achieve) – as well as ‘did it scale up in
the way that was expected?’ and what facilitated the scale up and what did not.

Original language	English
Publisher	University of Aberdeen
Number of pages	52
Publication status	Published - 2019

Bibliographical note

Funding The InS:PIRE programme and our evaluation of it were funded by The Health Foundation as part of the Scaling Up Improvement (Round Two) programme under shared grant number GN15AN414.

Cite this

@book{732782c276b245ddbe53c73e0bb94ba0,

title = "InS:PIRE - Evaluation of the scaling up of a quality improvement initiative: abridged report",

abstract = "The evaluation of the Intensive Care Syndrome: Promoting Independence and Return to Employment (InS:PIRE) project was designed to help understand whether and how the scaling up of the programme achieved its stated aims and objectives. Of particular interest was identifying how the scaling up process was enacted – what the scaling up achieved (or did not achieve) – as well as {\textquoteleft}did it scale up inthe way that was expected?{\textquoteright} and what facilitated the scale up and what did not.",

author = "Magdalena Rzewuska and Heather Morgan and Zoe Skea and John Norrie and Marion Campbell",

note = "Funding The InS:PIRE programme and our evaluation of it were funded by The Health Foundation as part of the Scaling Up Improvement (Round Two) programme under shared grant number GN15AN414.",

year = "2019",

language = "English",

publisher = "University of Aberdeen",

address = "United Kingdom",

}

TY - BOOK

T1 - InS:PIRE - Evaluation of the scaling up of a quality improvement initiative

T2 - abridged report

AU - Rzewuska, Magdalena

AU - Morgan, Heather

AU - Skea, Zoe

AU - Norrie, John

AU - Campbell, Marion

N1 - Funding The InS:PIRE programme and our evaluation of it were funded by The Health Foundation as part of the Scaling Up Improvement (Round Two) programme under shared grant number GN15AN414.

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - The evaluation of the Intensive Care Syndrome: Promoting Independence and Return to Employment (InS:PIRE) project was designed to help understand whether and how the scaling up of the programme achieved its stated aims and objectives. Of particular interest was identifying how the scaling up process was enacted – what the scaling up achieved (or did not achieve) – as well as ‘did it scale up inthe way that was expected?’ and what facilitated the scale up and what did not.

AB - The evaluation of the Intensive Care Syndrome: Promoting Independence and Return to Employment (InS:PIRE) project was designed to help understand whether and how the scaling up of the programme achieved its stated aims and objectives. Of particular interest was identifying how the scaling up process was enacted – what the scaling up achieved (or did not achieve) – as well as ‘did it scale up inthe way that was expected?’ and what facilitated the scale up and what did not.

M3 - Other Report

BT - InS:PIRE - Evaluation of the scaling up of a quality improvement initiative

PB - University of Aberdeen

ER -

InS:PIRE - Evaluation of the scaling up of a quality improvement initiative: abridged report

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Fingerprint

Cite this