Integrated survey methodologies provide process-driven framework for marine renewable energy environmental impact assessment

  • James Duncan Chapman
  • , Benjamin J. Williamson* (Corresponding Author)
  • , Ana Sofia Silva Couto
  • , Arianna Zampollo
  • , Ian M. Davies
  • , Beth Scott
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)
4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Environmental interactions of marine renewable energy developments vary from fine-scale direct (e.g. potential collision) to indirect wide-scale hydrodynamic changes altering oceanographic features. Current UK Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) and associated Habitats Regulations Appraisal (HRA) guidelines have limited focus on underlying processes affecting distribution and movements (hence vulnerability) of top predators. This study integrates multi-trophic ship survey (active acoustics and observer data) with an upward-facing seabed platform and 3-dimensional hydrodynamic model as a process-driven framework to investigate predator-prey linkages between seabirds and fish schools. Observer-only data highlighted the need to measure physical drivers of variance in species abundances and distributions. Active acoustics indicated that in situ (preferable to modelled) data were needed to identify temporal changes in hydrodynamics to predict prey and consequently top predator presence. Revising methods to identify key habitats and environmental covariates within current regulatory frameworks will enable more robust and transferable EIA and HRA processes and outputs, and at larger scales for cumulative and strategic-level assessments, enabling future modelling of ecosystem impacts from both climate change and renewable energy extraction.
Original languageEnglish
Article number106532
Number of pages15
JournalMarine Environmental Research
Volume198
Early online date3 May 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2024

Bibliographical note

The authors would like to the thank the FLOWBEC-4D development team as well as the observers and scientists of the MRV Scotia 2016 (Marianna Chimienti, Helen Wade, Laura Williamson, Ewan Edwards, and Eric Armstrong) and 2018 (Tom Evans, Sarah Fenn, Ross Culloch, David Hunter and Adrian Tait) surveys. Additionally, thanks go to Paul Fernandes (University of Aberdeen) for guidance and reviewing of the acoustic fisheries analysis undertaken here.

Data Availability Statement

Data will be made available on request.

Funding

The analysis was funded as part of a NERC CASE PhD Studentship Project (NE/P010067/1) with Marine Scotland Science. FLOWBEC-4D platform development and deployment were funded by NERC and Defra grant (NE/J004308/1) and a KTP with MeyGen Ltd (KTP009812). This work was supported by the NERC VertIBase project (NE/N01765X/1) and the UK Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy’s offshore energy Strategic Environmental Assessment programme. Elements of this work were funded by PELAgIO (NE/X008770/1). PELAgIO is part of the ‘The Ecological Consequences of Offshore Wind’ (ECOWind) programme, funded by the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC), The Crown Estate through its Offshore Wind Evidence and Change Programme and is also supported by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra).

FundersFunder number
Natural Environment Research Council (NERC)NE/P010067/1, NE/J004308/1, NE/N01765X/1, NE/X008770/1
MeyGen Ltd KTP009812

    Keywords

    • Biophysical data collection
    • environmental impact assessment
    • habitat
    • hydrodynamics
    • marine renewable energy
    • monitoring
    • monitoring guidance
    • seabirds
    • survey methods
    • uncertainty

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Integrated survey methodologies provide process-driven framework for marine renewable energy environmental impact assessment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this