Intrathecal Morphine and Post-Operative Pain Relief in Robotic Surgeries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Zi Heng Tee, Erica Ho Ching Tsoi, Quinston Lee, Yen Sin Wong, Arron Gibson, Niamh Parsons, Shafaque Shaikh, Patrice Forget

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

5 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Despite the potential benefits of intrathecal morphine (ITM), the precise role and dosing of ITM in robotic assisted surgery (RAS) remains unclear. This systematic review explores real-world evidence to evaluate the efficacy and outcomes of ITM in patients undergoing RAS. In accordance with PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive search was conducted on four databases: MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library and APA PsycInfo. Primary outcomes included pain scores at rest and on exertion at 24- and 48-h time intervals, and secondary outcomes aimed to explore the side effects of ITM. A meta-analysis was conducted to determine mean differences. A risk of bias assessment was conducted via the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool. A total of 9 RCTs involving 619 patients were included in this review, of which 298 patients were administered ITM. Significant pain score reductions were observed both at rest (MD = -27.15; 95% CI [-43.97, -10.33]; I 2 = 95%; p = 0.002) and on exertion (MD = -25.88; 95% CI [-37.03, -14.72]; I 2 = 79%; p = 0.0003) 24 h postoperatively in the ITM groups, accompanied by a notable decrease in postoperative IV morphine equivalent consumption at 24 h (MD = -20.13; 95% CI [-30.74, -9.52]; I 2 = 77%; p = 0.0002). ITM improved pain scores both at rest and on exertion at 24 and 48 h intervals, concurrently reducing the need for postoperative opioid consumption, but at the cost of an increased incidence of adverse events.

Original languageEnglish
Article number137
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Clinical Medicine
Volume13
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 26 Dec 2023

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Intrathecal Morphine and Post-Operative Pain Relief in Robotic Surgeries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this