Irrigation alters biogeochemical processes to increase both inorganic and organic carbon in arid-calcic cropland soils

  • K. R. Ball* (Corresponding Author)
  • , A. A. Malik
  • , C. Muscarella
  • , J. C. Blankinship
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Irrigation in arid croplands is necessary to sustain crop growth, but with increasing water scarcity and population growth in drylands, irrigation systems may need to shift from flooding to dripping techniques to cope with increased water demand. Therefore, it is important to understand how irrigation drives organic and inorganic carbon dynamics in arid-calcic soils. This study on arid-calcic cropland soils assessed the influence of flood and subsurface drip irrigation on soil organic carbon (SOC) and soil inorganic carbon (SIC) formation as influenced by soil chemical properties and bacterial and fungal biomass. As well, these dynamics were assessed in an unmanaged/unirrigated desert soil. Under drip irrigation, SOC was significantly greater than under flood irrigation, but flood stored more SIC than drip irrigation and no irrigation. The observed SOC–SIC patterns were likely driven by calcium binding. Flood irrigation adds significantly more calcium and bicarbonate to the system, while leaching dissolved organic carbon (DOC). Under flood, calcium is likely more preferentially bound as calcium carbonate. Under drip irrigation, less water was added, calcium and SOC were maintained in the rooting zone where SOC may be stabilized via cation-mediated bridging. Despite higher SOC under drip, more total, and bacterial biomass were detected under flood than drip irrigation, which promoted fungal biomass. Bacterial biomass under flood irrigation may be contributing to microbial carbonate precipitation, supported by the greater presence of common bacterial groups known to contribute to this process, and significant positive relationships with calcium. This research emphasizes the importance of examining SOC and SIC dynamics from abiotic and biotic and particularly microbial perspectives; to optimize soil carbon storage in arid croplands.

Original languageEnglish
Article number109189
Number of pages11
JournalSoil Biology and Biochemistry
Volume187
Early online date20 Oct 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2023

Bibliographical note

Funding and author contributions
KB devised the study, completed fieldwork, conducted the statistical analysis, and wrote the manuscript. JB devised the study, and JB, AM & CM contributed to manuscript development. Funding for this study was obtained under USDA-NRCS award NR193A750025C012.

Data Availability Statement

Data will be made available on request.

Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2023.109189.

Funding

In the studied soils, flood irrigation favored SIC formation, while drip irrigation favored development of SOC. The frequent wetting and drying under flood irrigation likely increased the loss of SOC through increased microbial respiration (Lundquist et al., 1999), while promoting calcium carbonate precipitation (Gile et al., 1966). Both these processes were likely exacerbated by lower overall SOC inputs by the crops compared with drip irrigation (Yang et al., 2023), greater leaching of DOC and Ca from the soil profile (Pool et al., 2022), and reduced stabilization of DOC by Ca-mediated organo-mineral bridging. Drip irrigation on the contrary leads to variable moisture distribution and increased SOC storage in surface soils (Emde et al., 2021). Therefore, while drip irrigation is often less favored over flood in arid-saline environments because of its inefficacy at leaching salts from the soil profile, it likely retains more DOC in the surface soil, as well as vital nutrients like nitrogen which significantly influence crop yield (Pool et al., 2022). Drip irrigation can also support higher plant growth, leading to relatively consistent carbon inputs and maintains DOC and calcium in the rooting zone where C can be stabilized. It is important to note, however, that the localized water inputs under drip irrigation can limit the positive effects of irrigation on SOC to the areas directly beneath the drippers, compared to other irrigation methods (Sánchez-Martín et al., 2008).KB devised the study, completed fieldwork, conducted the statistical analysis, and wrote the manuscript. JB devised the study, and JB, AM & CM contributed to manuscript development. Funding for this study was obtained under USDA-NRCS award NR193A750025C012. KB devised the study, completed fieldwork, conducted the statistical analysis, and wrote the manuscript. JB devised the study, and JB, AM & CM contributed to manuscript development. Funding for this study was obtained under USDA-NRCS award NR193A750025C012 .

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 2 - Zero Hunger
    SDG 2 Zero Hunger
  2. SDG 6 - Clean Water and Sanitation
    SDG 6 Clean Water and Sanitation

Keywords

  • Agricultural management
  • Biogeochemistry
  • Calcium
  • Inorganic carbon
  • Microbially induced carbonate precipitation (MICP)
  • Soil carbon sequestration

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Irrigation alters biogeochemical processes to increase both inorganic and organic carbon in arid-calcic cropland soils'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this