Micro-foundations of organizational design and sustainability: The mediating role of learning ambidexterity

Amer Ali Al-Atwi, Joseph Amankwah-Amoah* (Corresponding Author), Zaheer Khan

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper builds on prior scholarly works by examining the relationship between organizing paradox (formalization and decentralization), and organizational levels of learning paradoxes, i.e. exploration and exploitation, and firms’ outcomes (organizational creativity, organizational resilience and organizational energy). Using data from 98 executives and 325 senior employees working across a diverse range of firms operating in the Middle East, the findings suggest that organizing paradox (formalization and decentralization) has a positive impact on learning ambidexterity. In addition, we also found that learning ambidexterity has a positive impact on both organizational resilience and organizational energy. Furthermore, the results indicate that learning ambidexterity mediates the relationship between organizing paradox and organizational creativity. These findings provide important insights into the micro-foundation aspects of organizational ambidexterity.

Original languageEnglish
Article number101656
Number of pages11
JournalInternational Business Review
Volume30
Issue number1
Early online date20 Dec 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2021

Keywords

  • Ambidexterity
  • Emerging markets
  • Exploitation
  • Exploration
  • Micro-foundations
  • Middle East
  • Organizational design
  • Paradox

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Micro-foundations of organizational design and sustainability: The mediating role of learning ambidexterity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this