TY - JOUR
T1 - Natural Flood Management Through Peatland Restoration:
T2 - Catchment-Scale Modeling of Past and Future Scenarios in Glossop, UK
AU - Goudarzi, Salim
AU - Milledge, David G.
AU - Holden, Joseph
AU - Evans, Martin G.
AU - Allott, Timothy E. H.
AU - Johnston, Adam
AU - Shuttleworth, Emma L.
AU - Kay, Martin
AU - Brown, David
AU - Rees, Joe
AU - Edokpa, Donald
AU - Spencer, Tom
PY - 2024/8
Y1 - 2024/8
N2 - Field-scale experiments have shown the Natural Flood Management (NFM) potential of peatland restoration. The likelihoods of effectiveness are yet unknown at scales and storms large enough to impact human lives. Using GMD-TOPMODEL, we upscale a rare Before-After-Control-Intervention empirical data set to a 25 km2 catchment with >600 properties at flood-risk, and test storms of up to a 1,000-year return period (RP). Under these scales/storms, we find that it is not necessary (nor feasible) to delay the outlet flow-peak to meaningfully attenuate it. Enhancing catchment “kinematic” storage, for example, through restoration, can be sufficient to reduce flow magnitudes without detectable changes to peak-flow timing. NFM benefit increases exponentially with restoration area size under smaller storms, but linearly under larger storms. At RP ≤ 100 years, longer-lasting frontal-type storms are more challenging to defend against via NFM, but at RP > 100 years shorter-duration convectional-type events become more challenging. In the order of 1,000–10 years storms: (a) revegetating the bare-peat areas in 15% of the catchment is 31%–61% likely to reduce peak-flows by >5%; (b) revegetating & damming the erosion gullies in ∼20% of the catchment is 42%–71% likely to reduce peak-flows by >5%; (c) Growth of Sphagnum in the dammed gullies of ∼20% and ∼40% of the catchment increase the likelihoods of >5% peak reductions to 65%–86% and 90%–98%, respectively. The numerical evidence of significant NFM benefit due to Sphagnum re-establishment is an important finding, because it shows that meaningful flood-risk mitigation in headwater catchments under scales/storms relevant to communities at risk can be delivered alongside other ecosystem benefits of Sphagnum re-establishment.
AB - Field-scale experiments have shown the Natural Flood Management (NFM) potential of peatland restoration. The likelihoods of effectiveness are yet unknown at scales and storms large enough to impact human lives. Using GMD-TOPMODEL, we upscale a rare Before-After-Control-Intervention empirical data set to a 25 km2 catchment with >600 properties at flood-risk, and test storms of up to a 1,000-year return period (RP). Under these scales/storms, we find that it is not necessary (nor feasible) to delay the outlet flow-peak to meaningfully attenuate it. Enhancing catchment “kinematic” storage, for example, through restoration, can be sufficient to reduce flow magnitudes without detectable changes to peak-flow timing. NFM benefit increases exponentially with restoration area size under smaller storms, but linearly under larger storms. At RP ≤ 100 years, longer-lasting frontal-type storms are more challenging to defend against via NFM, but at RP > 100 years shorter-duration convectional-type events become more challenging. In the order of 1,000–10 years storms: (a) revegetating the bare-peat areas in 15% of the catchment is 31%–61% likely to reduce peak-flows by >5%; (b) revegetating & damming the erosion gullies in ∼20% of the catchment is 42%–71% likely to reduce peak-flows by >5%; (c) Growth of Sphagnum in the dammed gullies of ∼20% and ∼40% of the catchment increase the likelihoods of >5% peak reductions to 65%–86% and 90%–98%, respectively. The numerical evidence of significant NFM benefit due to Sphagnum re-establishment is an important finding, because it shows that meaningful flood-risk mitigation in headwater catchments under scales/storms relevant to communities at risk can be delivered alongside other ecosystem benefits of Sphagnum re-establishment.
KW - natural flood management
KW - nature based solutions
KW - Sphagnum re-establishment
KW - gully-blocking
KW - revegetation
KW - peatland restoration
UR - https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024WR037320
U2 - 10.1029/2024WR037320
DO - 10.1029/2024WR037320
M3 - Article
SN - 0043-1397
VL - 60
JO - Water Resources Research
JF - Water Resources Research
IS - 8
M1 - e2024WR037320
ER -