Natural Flood Management Through Peatland Restoration: Catchment-Scale Modeling of Past and Future Scenarios in Glossop, UK

Salim Goudarzi* (Corresponding Author), David G. Milledge, Joseph Holden, Martin G. Evans, Timothy E. H. Allott, Adam Johnston, Emma L. Shuttleworth, Martin Kay, David Brown, Joe Rees, Donald Edokpa, Tom Spencer

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)
4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Field-scale experiments have shown the Natural Flood Management (NFM) potential of peatland restoration. The likelihoods of effectiveness are yet unknown at scales and storms large enough to impact human lives. Using GMD-TOPMODEL, we upscale a rare Before-After-Control-Intervention empirical data set to a 25 km2 catchment with >600 properties at flood-risk, and test storms of up to a 1,000-year return period (RP). Under these scales/storms, we find that it is not necessary (nor feasible) to delay the outlet flow-peak to meaningfully attenuate it. Enhancing catchment “kinematic” storage, for example, through restoration, can be sufficient to reduce flow magnitudes without detectable changes to peak-flow timing. NFM benefit increases exponentially with restoration area size under smaller storms, but linearly under larger storms. At RP ≤ 100 years, longer-lasting frontal-type storms are more challenging to defend against via NFM, but at RP > 100 years shorter-duration convectional-type events become more challenging. In the order of 1,000–10 years storms: (a) revegetating the bare-peat areas in 15% of the catchment is 31%–61% likely to reduce peak-flows by >5%; (b) revegetating & damming the erosion gullies in ∼20% of the catchment is 42%–71% likely to reduce peak-flows by >5%; (c) Growth of Sphagnum in the dammed gullies of ∼20% and ∼40% of the catchment increase the likelihoods of >5% peak reductions to 65%–86% and 90%–98%, respectively. The numerical evidence of significant NFM benefit due to Sphagnum re-establishment is an important finding, because it shows that meaningful flood-risk mitigation in headwater catchments under scales/storms relevant to communities at risk can be delivered alongside other ecosystem benefits of Sphagnum re-establishment.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere2024WR037320
Number of pages26
JournalWater Resources Research
Volume60
Issue number8
Early online date26 Aug 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2024

Data Availability Statement

The hydrological data were collected as part of the Making Space for Water funded by DEFRA and the UK Environment Agency, and PROTECT NFM project funded by NERC, which are included in this paper: Shuttleworth et al. (2019). The numerical model (coded in MATLAB) is available from Goudarzi (2022).

Funding

This research was conducted as part of the NERC PROTECT-NFM project (NE/R004587) with a project steering committee including representatives from: Environment Agency, IUCN UK Peatland Programme, Moors for the Future Partnership, National Trust, Natural Resources Wales and SEPA. In addition to UK NERC funding, Joseph Holden has also received funding for peatland research in the last 5 years from Defra, Yorkshire Water, The National Trust, Forest Research, Research England, Peak District National Park Authority, North York Moors National Park Authority, the Environment Agency and the EU's Horizon 2020 programme

FundersFunder number
Natural Environment Research CouncilNE/R004587

    Keywords

    • natural flood management
    • nature based solutions
    • Sphagnum re-establishment
    • gully-blocking
    • revegetation
    • peatland restoration

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Natural Flood Management Through Peatland Restoration: Catchment-Scale Modeling of Past and Future Scenarios in Glossop, UK'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this