Abstract
In recent years the assumption that democracy automatically generates peace has been critiqued. It has instead been suggested that the promotion of economic liberalism provides a much stronger basis for peace. In this paper, we examine and contest the normative claims of the ‘capitalist peace’. While there is a close association between extreme poverty and the onset of civil war, it is unclear whether economic liberalism will ameliorate conflict. A major reason for this ambiguity is because the emphasis of the ‘capitalist peace’ literature has largely been on interstate relations rather than intrastate ethnonational conflict. A closer look reveals that neoliberal policies in divided societies can also, in some contexts, exacerbate conflict in violently divided societies.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 218-236 |
Number of pages | 19 |
Journal | Civil Wars |
Volume | 12 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 27 Sept 2010 |