Patient Evaluation of a Community Pharmacy Medications Management Service

Michela Tinelli, Christine Margaret Bond, Alison Blenkinsopp, Mariesha Jaffray, Margaret Camilla Watson, Philip Christopher Hannaford, Community Pharmacy Medicines Management Evaluation Team

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

63 Citations (Scopus)


BACKGROUND: A patient-centered approach is increasingly recognized as an important component in the evaluation of healthcare services.

OBJECTIVE: To assess patient satisfaction with, attitudes toward, and expectations of or experience with community pharmacy in general, and to evaluate the effect of the community pharmacy–led medications management service on these factors.

METHODS: Postal questionnaire surveys were completed at baseline and after 12 months (follow-up) as part of a randomized controlled trial of the service. The setting was 9 primary care organizations in England. Patients with coronary heart disease were recruited from general practice registers and randomly allocated to the intervention (pharmacy-led medications management service) or control group.

RESULTS: Survey response rates at baseline and follow-up were 88.4% (1232/1394) and 80.1% (1085/1355), respectively. The respondents indicated that they wanted pharmacists to provide dispensing, medications review, advice on medications and health, private consultation areas, and short visit times. At follow-up, intervention patients were more likely than control patients (p< 0.01) to rate the service provided by their pharmacist with a higher level of satisfaction, and most intervention patients stated a preference for seeing their physician to discuss their medications, although this was less marked than in control patients (76% vs 85%; p < 0.01). Intervention patients were also more willing than control patients to ask the pharmacist questions that they would be unable to ask a physician (20% vs 11%, respectively; p < 0.01), to ask the pharmacist questions about their medications (32% vs 18%, respectively; p < 0.01), and to recommend this practice to others (51% vs 40%, respectively; p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacist intervention was associated with significant and positive changes in patient satisfaction. While patients probably continue to prefer a physician-led service, they value aspects of a pharmacy service. Patients generally preferred discussing medications with the family physician, but experiencing the community pharmacy–led service resulted in an attitudinal shift toward the pharmacist. These findings suggest a benefit in developing the community pharmacist's role as a reviewer of, and adviser on, patients' medications.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1962-1970
Number of pages9
JournalThe Annals of Pharmacotherapy
Issue number12
Early online date30 Oct 2007
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2007


  • aged
  • community pharmacy services
  • female
  • humans
  • male
  • medication therapy management
  • patient satisfaction
  • pharmacists
  • physicians, family
  • professional role
  • professional-patient relations
  • questionnaires


Dive into the research topics of 'Patient Evaluation of a Community Pharmacy Medications Management Service'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this