Abstract
Because of its complexity, dispersal has often been simplified when implemented in models aiming at understanding and predicting population dynamics and persistence in a context of environmental change. In particular, informed dispersal, that is the use of personal and social information to decide whether to leave a natal or current breeding site and where to settle, has seldom been considered. Informed dispersal could nevertheless be critical for predicting population dynamics, structure and persistence, as it could help populations track environmental change. Here, we develop a simulation model to examine the consequences of four dispersal strategies (informed, semi‐informed, fixed random dispersal and philopatry) on the dynamics, structure and persistence of a spatially structured population under different environmental scenarios.
MethodsWe built and parameterized a metapopulation dynamic model using a long‐lived colonial seabird species as an example, the black‐legged kittiwake Rissa tridactyla, breeding on a set of distinct patches. Various scenarios of environmental variability and multiple factors potentially driving natal and breeding dispersal decisions (local habitat quality, individual and conspecific breeding success, personal and social information use) were considered to explore their respective effects.
ResultsEnvironmental change and dispersal strategies strongly influenced metapopulation dynamics and structure. In spatially variable environments, informed and semi‐informed dispersal maintained populations in the long term, whereas philopatry and random dispersal led to extinction. Contrasted dynamics also arose: philopatry led to ecological traps, random and semi‐informed dispersal led to source‐sink dynamics and informed dispersal drove extinction–recolonization dynamics.
Main conclusionsThis study demonstrates the importance of including informed dispersal in models aiming at predicting the dynamics of spatially structured populations. It also serves to highlight the urgent need to collect more empirical data on dispersal processes to properly parameterize such models.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 88-100 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Diversity and Distributions |
| Volume | 21 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Early online date | 22 Oct 2014 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jan 2015 |
Bibliographical note
The authors thank Karen McCoy, Torkild Tveraa, Per Fauchald, Rob Barrett and Blandine Doligez for fruitful discussions on the topic of this study. The authors also thank Justin Travis, Risto Heikkinen, Maria Delgado and two anonymous referees who provided constructive comments on an earlier version of the manuscript. Funding of fieldwork related to the theoretical ideas modelled in this paper has been provided by the French Polar Institute (IPEV program 333, PARASITO‐ARCTIQUE). The PhD thesis of AP was funded by the University of Montpellier 2 and a Région Languedoc‐Roussillon program ‘Chercheur d'Avenir’ award to TB.Keywords
- Breeding habitat selection
- climate change
- conspecific breeding success
- extinction probabilities
- prospecting behaviour
- social information use
