Abstract
In Keatings v Advocate General, the pursuer sought to appeal the decision of the Lord Ordinary (Lady Carmichael) to dismiss his action of declarator.2 The pursuer wanted two declarators to confirm that it was within the competence of the Scottish Parliament to legislate unilaterally for an independence referendum, and that no provision of the Scottish Government’s proposed legislation on the matter fell outside of that competence.The Lord Ordinary had refused to make these declarators on the groundsthat they were “hypothetical, academic and premature”.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 362-369 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | Edinburgh Law Review |
| Volume | 25 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Early online date | 20 Sept 2021 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Sept 2021 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Public Law Declarators, the Jurisdiction of the Court, and Scottish Independence: Keatings v Advocate General'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS