Abstract
Tephra layers can form useful age-equivalent stratigraphic markers for correlating palaeoenvironmental sequences and they provide information about the spatio-temporal nature of past volcanic ash fall events. The use of microscopic cryptotephra' layers has both increased the stratigraphic resolution of tephra sequences in proximal areas and extended the distal application of tephrochronology to regions of the world situated far from volcanoes. Effective tephrochronology requires the discrimination between in situ tephra deposited directly from volcanic plumes and tephras that have been remobilised since their initial deposition. We present tephrostratigraphic and glass chemistry data from two proximal peat profiles (one lowland, one upland) from the Shetland Islands, UK. Both profiles contain the Hekla-Selsund tephra (deposited c. 1800-1750 cal. bc), whilst the Hekla 4 ash (c. 2395-2279 cal. bc) is present in the upland record. Overlying the Hekla-Selsund tephra are a number of distinct peaks in tephra shard abundance. The geochemistry of these layers shows that they represent re-working of the Hekla 4 and Hekla-Selsund layers rather than primary air-fall deposits. Pollen analysis of the peat sequences illustrates that these re-deposited tephra layers are coincident with a rise in heather-dominated vegetation communities (heath and/or moorland) and a subsequent intensification of burning in the landscape. We suggest that burning caused increased erosion of peats resulting in the remobilisation of tephra shards. The study demonstrates both the need for caution and the opportunities created when applying tephrochronologies in regions heavily affected by past human activity that contain both reworked tephra layers and in situ fallout.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1493-1501 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | The Holocene |
| Volume | 23 |
| Issue number | 10 |
| Early online date | 4 Jun 2013 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Oct 2013 |
Bibliographical note
AcknowledgmentsWe would like to thank Dr Chris Hayward (University of Edinburgh) and Dr Eric Condliffe (University of Leeds) for their advice on tephra geochemical analysis. Many thanks to Gill Plunkett and Keith Bennett (Queen’s University Belfast) for constructive comments on the pollen data. Many thanks to all staff and students involved in the Viking Unst project for their assistance in the field. We thank Linda Dancey, GSC-Calgary for pollen preparation. We also thank Dr James White and two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on the manuscript.
Funding
We thank the Shetland Amenity Trust for funding further geochemical analysis at the University of Leeds. The Viking Unst Project investigations at Underhoull were sponsored by Heritage Lottery Fund, European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund, Shetland Development Trust, Shetland Enterprise Company, Shetland Amenity Trust, Historic Scotland, Shetland Islands Council, and the University of Bradford, with additional funding from International Polar Year project 'Long Term Human Ecodynamics in the Norse North Atlantic: cases of sustainability, survival, and collapse' (NSF Award number 0732327). This research was also supported by grants from the Natural Environmental Research Council (UK) for <SUP>14</SUP>C dating (allocations: 1493.0910, 1466.0410) and geochemical analysis of tephras at the School of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh (allocation: TAU58/1109).
Keywords
- archaeology
- Hekla
- re-working
- Shetland Islands
- taphonomy
- tephra
- Faroe-Islands
- hazard assessment
- tephra layers
- volcanic ash
- human impact
- New-Zealand
- tephrochronology
- Iceland
- Scotland
- geochemistry