Abstract
We read with interest the article by Martin et al regarding a “standard set” of outcomes for localised prostate cancer (PCa) [1]. This important project attempts to deal with heterogeneity of outcome selection, definition, measurement, and reporting in PCa management. The authors should be commended on addressing the problem in a thoughtful, methodical, and comprehensive manner.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | e123-e124 |
| Number of pages | 2 |
| Journal | European Urology |
| Volume | 68 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| Early online date | 29 Aug 2015 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Dec 2015 |
Bibliographical note
Date of Acceptance: 11/08/2015UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Re Neil E. Martin, Laura Massey, Caleb Stowell, et al. Defining a Standard Set of Patient-centered Outcomes for Men with Localized Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol 2015;67:460-7'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS