Abstract
This article examines recent development in the regulatory landscape of online harms in the UK and US through a free speech lens. In so doing, it undertakes a comparative analysis of the UK’s Online Safety Act 2023 and laws in US states that is grounded in UN guidance advising that approaches to regulating online harms be grounded in human rights. Ultimately, this examination leads to the conclusion that the Online Safety Act and similar efforts at the state level in the US do not reflect human rights based approaches to regulation in this area. While American courts are reigning in state legislation based on the expansive protection of free speech under the First Amendment, the constitutional restraints in the UK are weaker. This raises concerns regarding the adequate protection of the free speech rights of internet users, particularly in the UK.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Number of pages | 32 |
| Journal | Journal of Media Law |
| Early online date | 29 Aug 2024 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 29 Aug 2024 |
Bibliographical note
The author would like to thank the anonymous reviewers and Dr Hedvig Schmidt for their invaluable feedback on previous drafts of this article.Data Availability Statement
No data availability statement.Keywords
- Free speech
- Online Safety Act 2023
- First Amendment
- online speech