Reinforcing the concept of agenda-driven science: a response to Rohlf

R. J. Gutiérrez; Gavin Jones; Steve M. Redpath; Alan B. Franklin; Daniel Simberloff; Monica G. Turner; Volker C. Radeloff; Gary C. White; M. Zachariah Peery

doi:10.1002/fee.2131

Reinforcing the concept of agenda-driven science: a response to Rohlf

R. J. Gutiérrez^*, Gavin Jones, Steve M. Redpath, Alan B. Franklin, Daniel Simberloff, Monica G. Turner, Volker C. Radeloff, Gary C. White, M. Zachariah Peery

^*Corresponding author for this work

Aberdeen Centre For Environmental Sustainability

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

Abstract

We appreciate not only the perspective that Rohlf presents regarding the nexus between conservation science and policy advocacy but also the opportunity his response provides us to reemphasize the ways in which agenda‐driven science can be problematic (Peery et al . 2019).

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	556-557
Number of pages	2
Journal	Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment
Volume	17
Issue number	10
Early online date	2 Dec 2019
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.2131
Publication status	Published - Dec 2019

Access to Document

10.1002/fee.2131Licence: Unspecified

Cite this

@article{b2f760cfafe84142a3739b9a479ee1ec,

title = "Reinforcing the concept of agenda-driven science: a response to Rohlf",

abstract = "We appreciate not only the perspective that Rohlf presents regarding the nexus between conservation science and policy advocacy but also the opportunity his response provides us to reemphasize the ways in which agenda‐driven science can be problematic (Peery et al . 2019). ",

author = "Guti{\'e}rrez, {R. J.} and Gavin Jones and Redpath, {Steve M.} and Franklin, {Alan B.} and Daniel Simberloff and Turner, {Monica G.} and Radeloff, {Volker C.} and White, {Gary C.} and Peery, {M. Zachariah}",

year = "2019",

month = dec,

doi = "10.1002/fee.2131",

language = "English",

volume = "17",

pages = "556--557",

journal = "Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment",

issn = "1540-9295",

publisher = "Wiley",

number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reinforcing the concept of agenda-driven science

T2 - a response to Rohlf

AU - Gutiérrez, R. J.

AU - Jones, Gavin

AU - Redpath, Steve M.

AU - Franklin, Alan B.

AU - Simberloff, Daniel

AU - Turner, Monica G.

AU - Radeloff, Volker C.

AU - White, Gary C.

AU - Peery, M. Zachariah

PY - 2019/12

Y1 - 2019/12

N2 - We appreciate not only the perspective that Rohlf presents regarding the nexus between conservation science and policy advocacy but also the opportunity his response provides us to reemphasize the ways in which agenda‐driven science can be problematic (Peery et al . 2019).

AB - We appreciate not only the perspective that Rohlf presents regarding the nexus between conservation science and policy advocacy but also the opportunity his response provides us to reemphasize the ways in which agenda‐driven science can be problematic (Peery et al . 2019).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075914057&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/fee.2131

DO - 10.1002/fee.2131

M3 - Comment/debate

AN - SCOPUS:85075914057

SN - 1540-9295

VL - 17

SP - 556

EP - 557

JO - Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment

JF - Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment

IS - 10

ER -

Reinforcing the concept of agenda-driven science: a response to Rohlf

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this