Reproductive ambition predicts partnered, but not unpartnered, women’s preferences for masculine men

Christopher David Watkins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)


Changing circumstances alter the costs and benefits of choosing different mates and are thought to be reflected in women’s mate preferences. Indeed, several lines of reasoning, and some prior studies, suggest that individual differences in women’s preferences for cues of men’s underlying health will be more apparent among partnered women than among unpartnered women. The current study shows that preferences for male faces with masculine shape cues, characteristics that are thought to signal men’s underlying health, are positively correlated with partnered, but not unpartnered, women’s reported reproductive ambition (i.e., their desire to become pregnant). These findings (1) present new evidence for systematic variation in women’s mating strategies, (2) suggest partnership status may be important for potentially adaptive variation in women’s mate preferences and (3) suggest reproductive ambition may influence women’s mate preferences. Alternative explanations for these findings, focusing on the possible effects of a range of variables that may be correlated with reproductive ambition in partnered women and influence their masculinity preferences, are also discussed.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)317-329
Number of pages14
JournalBritish Journal of Psychology
Issue number3
Early online date3 Oct 2011
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2012


Dive into the research topics of 'Reproductive ambition predicts partnered, but not unpartnered, women’s preferences for masculine men'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this