Abstract
Residual microcalcifications on mammograms after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) pose a challenge in surgical decision-making. This single-centre retrospective review of all patients who had NACT for breast cancer over five years, evaluated the relationship between pathological complete response and residual microcalcifications, controlling for tumour size, nodal stage, grade, and receptor status, as well as the impact of residual microcalcifications on recurrence and survival. There was no significant association between pathological complete response (pCR) and residual microcalcifications (p = 0.763). We computed hazard ratios (HR) for Time to recurrence (TTR) and overall survival (OS) which were both not significant, with HR = 2.599, [0.290, 23.264], p = 0.393 and HR = 1.362 [0.123, 15.062], p = 0.801 respectively. The predictive and prognostic significance of residual microcalcifications remains to be proven. The surgical excision of these lesions should be considered based on individual patient risk.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 108781 |
| Journal | European Journal of Surgical Oncology |
| Volume | 51 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Early online date | 31 Oct 2024 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jan 2025 |
Bibliographical note
CRediT authorship contribution statementJoel Allotey: were responsible for data collection, was responsible for writing, data management, Formal analysis, Project administration. Vinita Ruparel: were responsible for data collection. Anna McCallum: were responsible for data collection. Karendeep Somal: were responsible for data collection. Louise Simpson: were responsible for critical review of the manuscript. Gaurav Gupta: were responsible for critical review of the manuscript. Gerald Lip: were responsible for critical review of the manuscript. Ravi Sharma: contributed the, Conceptualization, of the project and provided, Supervision, were responsible for critical review of the manuscript. Yazan Masannat: contributed the, Conceptualization, of the project and provided, Supervision, were responsible for critical review of the manuscript.
Funding
No funding declared