Response to Bataille et al.'s ‘Technological differences between Kostenki 17/II (Spitsynskaya industry, Central Russia) and the Protoaurignacian: Reply to Dinnis et al. (2019)’

Robert Dinnis; Alexander Bessudnov; Natasha Reynolds; Abi Pate; Mikhail Sablin; Andrei Sinitsyn

doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2020.102792

Response to Bataille et al.'s ‘Technological differences between Kostenki 17/II (Spitsynskaya industry, Central Russia) and the Protoaurignacian: Reply to Dinnis et al. (2019)’

Robert Dinnis^* (Corresponding Author), Alexander Bessudnov, Natasha Reynolds, Abi Pate, Mikhail Sablin, Andrei Sinitsyn

^*Corresponding author for this work

Archaeology

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We appreciate Bataille et al.'s (2019) interest in our article, but we take issue with their reply. Here, we address their arguments, clarify our work, and outline some of the errors evident in their critical comment.

Original language	English
Article number	102792
Number of pages	5
Journal	Journal of Human Evolution
Volume	146
Early online date	28 Apr 2020
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2020.102792
Publication status	Published - Sept 2020

Bibliographical note

We are grateful to Thibaut Devièse, Damien Flas, Jennifer French, Julien Riel-Salvatore, Olivier Touzé, and João Zilhão for information and discussions. We also thank the reviewers and David Alba for their comments. A.B. acknowledges the Russian Science Foundation, grant RSF 18-78-00136. N.R. acknowledges the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement no 747400. We also acknowledge the participation of ZIN RAS (state assignment no. АААА-А17-117022810195-3).

Keywords

Aurignacian
Lithic technology
Fumane
Labeko Koba
Arbreda
Aquitaine model
CHRONOLOGY
LIGURIA
MIDDLE
PROTO-AURIGNACIAN

Access to Document

10.1016/j.jhevol.2020.102792Licence: Unspecified

Cite this

Response to Bataille et al.'s ‘Technological differences between Kostenki 17/II (Spitsynskaya industry, Central Russia) and the Protoaurignacian: Reply to Dinnis et al. (2019)’. / Dinnis, Robert (Corresponding Author); Bessudnov, Alexander; Reynolds, Natasha et al.
In: Journal of Human Evolution, Vol. 146, 102792, 09.2020.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

@article{8a94e2b280ba41a89ce1bc4c8aabeabf,

title = "Response to Bataille et al.'s {\textquoteleft}Technological differences between Kostenki 17/II (Spitsynskaya industry, Central Russia) and the Protoaurignacian: Reply to Dinnis et al. (2019){\textquoteright}",

abstract = "We appreciate Bataille et al.'s (2019) interest in our article, but we take issue with their reply. Here, we address their arguments, clarify our work, and outline some of the errors evident in their critical comment.",

keywords = "Aurignacian, Lithic technology, Fumane, Labeko Koba, Arbreda, Aquitaine model, CHRONOLOGY, LIGURIA, MIDDLE, PROTO-AURIGNACIAN",

author = "Robert Dinnis and Alexander Bessudnov and Natasha Reynolds and Abi Pate and Mikhail Sablin and Andrei Sinitsyn",

note = "We are grateful to Thibaut Devi{\`e}se, Damien Flas, Jennifer French, Julien Riel-Salvatore, Olivier Touz{\'e}, and Jo{\~a}o Zilh{\~a}o for information and discussions. We also thank the reviewers and David Alba for their comments. A.B. acknowledges the Russian Science Foundation, grant RSF 18-78-00136. N.R. acknowledges the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under Marie Sk{\l}odowska-Curie grant agreement no 747400. We also acknowledge the participation of ZIN RAS (state assignment no. АААА-А17-117022810195-3). ",

year = "2020",

month = sep,

doi = "10.1016/j.jhevol.2020.102792",

language = "English",

volume = "146",

journal = "Journal of Human Evolution",

issn = "0047-2484",

publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Response to Bataille et al.'s ‘Technological differences between Kostenki 17/II (Spitsynskaya industry, Central Russia) and the Protoaurignacian: Reply to Dinnis et al. (2019)’

AU - Dinnis, Robert

AU - Bessudnov, Alexander

AU - Reynolds, Natasha

AU - Pate, Abi

AU - Sablin, Mikhail

AU - Sinitsyn, Andrei

N1 - We are grateful to Thibaut Devièse, Damien Flas, Jennifer French, Julien Riel-Salvatore, Olivier Touzé, and João Zilhão for information and discussions. We also thank the reviewers and David Alba for their comments. A.B. acknowledges the Russian Science Foundation, grant RSF 18-78-00136. N.R. acknowledges the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement no 747400. We also acknowledge the participation of ZIN RAS (state assignment no. АААА-А17-117022810195-3).

PY - 2020/9

Y1 - 2020/9

N2 - We appreciate Bataille et al.'s (2019) interest in our article, but we take issue with their reply. Here, we address their arguments, clarify our work, and outline some of the errors evident in their critical comment.

AB - We appreciate Bataille et al.'s (2019) interest in our article, but we take issue with their reply. Here, we address their arguments, clarify our work, and outline some of the errors evident in their critical comment.

KW - Aurignacian

KW - Lithic technology

KW - Fumane

KW - Labeko Koba

KW - Arbreda

KW - Aquitaine model

KW - CHRONOLOGY

KW - LIGURIA

KW - MIDDLE

KW - PROTO-AURIGNACIAN

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85083800074&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jhevol.2020.102792

DO - 10.1016/j.jhevol.2020.102792

M3 - Comment/debate

SN - 0047-2484

VL - 146

JO - Journal of Human Evolution

JF - Journal of Human Evolution

M1 - 102792

ER -

Response to Bataille et al.'s ‘Technological differences between Kostenki 17/II (Spitsynskaya industry, Central Russia) and the Protoaurignacian: Reply to Dinnis et al. (2019)’

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this