Abstract
This industry-funded commentary misrepresents the rigorous methodology used to evaluate human literature associating phthalate exposure with endometriosis. It ignores consistency in findings from human and animal studies and substantial laboratory data strongly supporting causative effects carefully documented in our manuscript.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 110-111 |
| Number of pages | 2 |
| Journal | Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism |
| Volume | 101 |
| Issue number | 11 |
| Early online date | 4 Nov 2016 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2016 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Response to the Letter by G. M. H. Swaen and R. Otter'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS