Abstract
Globally, asthma morbidity remains unacceptably high. If outcomes are to be improved, it is crucial that routine review consultations in primary care are performed to a high standard. Key components of a review include: * Assessment of control using specific morbidity questions to elucidate the presence of symptoms, in conjunction with the frequency of use of short-acting bronchodilators and any recent history of acute attacks * After consideration of the diagnosis, and an assessment of compliance, inhaler technique, smoking status, triggers, and rhinitis, identification of poor control should result in a step-up of treatment in accordance with evidence-based guideline recommendations * Discussion should address understanding of the condition, patient-centred management goals and attitudes to regular treatment, and should include personalised self-management education Regular review of people with asthma coupled with provision of self-management education improves outcomes. Underpinned by a theoretical framework integrating professional reviews and patient self-care we discuss the practical barriers to implementing guided selfmanagement in routine clinical practice.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 75-83 |
Number of pages | 9 |
Journal | Primary Care Respiratory Journal |
Volume | 19 |
Issue number | 1 |
Early online date | 29 Jan 2010 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Mar 2010 |
Keywords
- asthma
- bronchodilator agents
- evidence-based practice
- humans
- medication adherence
- patient acceptance of health care
- patient education as topic
- physician-patient relations
- practice guidelines as topic
- primary health care
- risk factors
- primary care
- guided self-management
- monitoring long-term conditions
- asthma action plan