Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Tectono-thermal evolution of central Transcaucasia: Thermal modelling, seismic interpretation, and low-temperature thermochronology of the eastern Adjara-Trialeti and western Kura sedimentary basins (Georgia)

  • Thomas Gusmeo*
  • , Andrea Schito
  • , Sveva Corrado
  • , Victor Alania
  • , Onise Enukidze
  • , Massimiliano Zattin
  • , Paolo Pace
  • , William Cavazza
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • University of Bologna
  • Roma Tre University
  • Tbilisi State University
  • University of Padua
  • Gabriele d'Annunzio University
  • PACE Geoscience

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Structural interference along the boundaries of adjacent tectonic domains generates complex subsidence and exhumation patterns. In this paper we study a key segment of the convergence zone between the interfering south-verging Greater Caucasus and north-verging Lesser Caucasus retro-wedge. The study area comprises the along-strike transition between the Paleogene Adjara-Trialeti back-arc basin and the Oligocene-Neogene Kura foreland basin of eastern Georgia. During the Neogene, despite their difference in age and subsidence mechanisms, both basins have been progressively inverted to various extent within the overall context of the Arabia-Eurasia continental collision. Thermal modelling of borehole data from the Adjara-Trialeti basin allowed to reconstruct two phases of rapid subsidence, late Paleocene-Early Eocene and Middle-Late Eocene, respectively correlated to flexural loading by the Lesser Caucasus retro-wedge and continental rifting. Integration of thermal modelling, apatite fission-track statistical inverse modelling, and seismic interpretation detected a third subsidence phase in the Early Miocene, possibly related to strike-slip tectonics. Thermal maturity data dictate that 1.0–1.3 km of the Adjara-Trialeti sedimentary succession has been eroded since the onset of structural inversion in the mid-Miocene. The burial history of the western Kura Basin outlines intermittent and asymmetrical episodes of flexural subsidence from the Oligocene to the Late Miocene, due to competing loading by the Lesser Caucasus, the Adjara-Trialeti fold-and-thrust belt and the Greater Caucasus. Finally, during latest Miocene times southward propagation of deformation from the Greater Caucasus induced an additional tectonic loading (1.3–1.8 km) due to the emplacement of thin-skinned thrust sheets, mostly eroded during the Plio-Quaternary.

Original languageEnglish
Article number105355
Number of pages22
JournalJournal of Asian Earth Sciences
Volume237
Early online date5 Aug 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2022

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
We thank GOGC (Georgian Oil & Gas company) for kindly providing part of the lithological and thermal maturity data used in this study. Platte River Associates, Inc. is acknowledged for providing an academic licence for the Basin Mod 2-D software package. Reinhard Sachsenhofer (Montanuniversität Leoben) provided useful comments on an earlier version of the manuscript. We thank JAES Associate Editor Michel Faure and an anonymous reviewer for their constructive input. Irene Albino assisted in sample preparation for fission-track analysis. This research was funded by the PRIN Program of the Italian Ministry of University and Research 2017-2020.

Funding Information:
We thank GOGC (Georgian Oil & Gas company) for kindly providing part of the lithological and thermal maturity data used in this study. Platte River Associates, Inc. is acknowledged for providing an academic licence for the Basin Mod 2-D software package. Reinhard Sachsenhofer (Montanuniversität Leoben) provided useful comments on an earlier version of the manuscript. We thank JAES Associate Editor Michel Faure and an anonymous reviewer for their constructive input. Irene Albino assisted in sample preparation for fission-track analysis. This research was funded by the PRIN Program of the Italian Ministry of University and Research 2017-2020.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Elsevier Ltd

Data Availability Statement

Data will be made available on request.

Funding

We thank GOGC (Georgian Oil & Gas company) for kindly providing part of the lithological and thermal maturity data used in this study. Platte River Associates, Inc. is acknowledged for providing an academic licence for the Basin Mod 2-D software package. Reinhard Sachsenhofer (Montanuniversität Leoben) provided useful comments on an earlier version of the manuscript. We thank JAES Associate Editor Michel Faure and an anonymous reviewer for their constructive input. Irene Albino assisted in sample preparation for fission-track analysis. This research was funded by the PRIN Program of the Italian Ministry of University and Research 2017-2020. We thank GOGC (Georgian Oil & Gas company) for kindly providing part of the lithological and thermal maturity data used in this study. Platte River Associates, Inc. is acknowledged for providing an academic licence for the Basin Mod 2-D software package. Reinhard Sachsenhofer (Montanuniversität Leoben) provided useful comments on an earlier version of the manuscript. We thank JAES Associate Editor Michel Faure and an anonymous reviewer for their constructive input. Irene Albino assisted in sample preparation for fission-track analysis. This research was funded by the PRIN Program of the Italian Ministry of University and Research 2017-2020.

Keywords

  • Fission-track thermochronology
  • Kura Basin
  • Structural interference
  • Thermal maturity
  • Thermal modelling
  • Transcaucasus

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Tectono-thermal evolution of central Transcaucasia: Thermal modelling, seismic interpretation, and low-temperature thermochronology of the eastern Adjara-Trialeti and western Kura sedimentary basins (Georgia)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this