Abstract
We (the authors) acknowledge and welcome this letter of clarification from Koeser and McCrone [1] (hereafter referred to as KM). With this reply, we would like to justify and clarify our use and interpretation of quantile regression techniques in quality-of-life research based on our two papers using data from the Community Pharmacy Medicines Management Project [2].
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 229-230 |
| Number of pages | 2 |
| Journal | Pharmacoeconomics |
| Volume | 32 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Early online date | 18 Jan 2014 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Feb 2014 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Female
- Health Policy
- Humans
- Male
- Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
- Quality of Life
- Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The authors' reply to Koeser and McCrone: "on the use and interpretation of quantile regression in quality-of-life research"'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS