The Crown appeal against sentence in HM Advocate v Nawshowani – Part 2: use of the English guidelines on sentencing rape as a cross-check

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

In the second of five articles on the Crown appeal against sentence in HM Advocate v Nawshowani (Barzan) [2024] HCJAC 21, the author reviews the English guidelines on sentencing rape and questions the decision of the appeal court to dispose of the Crown’s appeal without reference to those guidelines. The major disparity between the sentence imposed by the appeal court and the sentence indicated by a proper application of the English guidelines is highlighted and discussed.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)135-146
Number of pages12
JournalScots Law Times
Issue number26
Early online date18 Sept 2024
Publication statusPublished - 2024

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Crown appeal against sentence in HM Advocate v Nawshowani – Part 2: use of the English guidelines on sentencing rape as a cross-check'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this