Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The effect of post-identification feedback on the recall of crime and perpetrator details

  • Susan Dixon* (Corresponding Author)
  • , Amina Memon
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The present study examines the effect of identification feedback on the quantity and accuracy of crime event details recalled, willingness to attempt misleading questions and confidence in the accuracy of these details. All participants (N = 60) viewed a short video clip of a staged building society robbery and then made a false identification of the robber from a target-absent photospread. Eyewitnesses were next given confirming feedback (i.e. told that they had identified the suspect), disconfirming feedback (i.e. told that they had failed to identify the suspect) or no feedback. All eyewitnesses then attempted a series of short-answer questions relating to details about the robber, accomplice, victim, building society, theft and getaway. Disconfirming feedback significantly reduced eyewitness confidence in recall accuracy but there was no significant effect of feedback on the overall quantity and accuracy of details recalled or willingness to attempt misleading questions. The theoretical implications of these results are discussed.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)935-951
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Applied Cognitive Psychology
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2005

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The effect of post-identification feedback on the recall of crime and perpetrator details'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this