Abstract
Purpose – Supermarket promotions typically use a standard label, which displays the regular price, discounted price, and discounted unit-price. Visits to supermarkets across multiple countries found that none used a price label that also contains the regular (i.e., prediscounted) unit-price. This study investigated the effectiveness of a dual unit-price label that includes the regular unit-price as a reference price, and what underpins its efficacy in enhancing promotion attractiveness.
Design/methodology/approach – We executed four studies, supported by three supplemental studies. Study 1 established external validity through a natural instore experiment. Study 2 and 3 tested the dual unit-price label with different pack sizes and assortment sizes, respectively. Finally, Study 4 tested the underpinning mechanism of the efficacy of the dual unit-price label.
Findings – In Study 1, daily sales records over four weeks showed that dual unit-price label promotions had larger sales volume than standard-label promotions. Study 2 showed that a larger pack size, a heuristic cue for greater economy, increased preference for dual unit-price label promotions. Study 3 similarly found that the dual unit-price label was preferred more as cognitive load was increased by assortment size. Finally, Study 4 demonstrated the dual processing of the dual unit-price label, using a conscious preference measure (information provided) and an unconscious implicit attitude test.
Research limitations/implications – Unit-price research has mainly considered a cognitive process. We demonstrated the importance of considering a heuristic process.
Practical implications – Supermarkets can use this simple and yet effective tool to improve promotion effectiveness.
Originality/value – Our findings offer a new and easy tool to enhance sales promotions, which academic research and managerial practice had never considered previously.
Design/methodology/approach – We executed four studies, supported by three supplemental studies. Study 1 established external validity through a natural instore experiment. Study 2 and 3 tested the dual unit-price label with different pack sizes and assortment sizes, respectively. Finally, Study 4 tested the underpinning mechanism of the efficacy of the dual unit-price label.
Findings – In Study 1, daily sales records over four weeks showed that dual unit-price label promotions had larger sales volume than standard-label promotions. Study 2 showed that a larger pack size, a heuristic cue for greater economy, increased preference for dual unit-price label promotions. Study 3 similarly found that the dual unit-price label was preferred more as cognitive load was increased by assortment size. Finally, Study 4 demonstrated the dual processing of the dual unit-price label, using a conscious preference measure (information provided) and an unconscious implicit attitude test.
Research limitations/implications – Unit-price research has mainly considered a cognitive process. We demonstrated the importance of considering a heuristic process.
Practical implications – Supermarkets can use this simple and yet effective tool to improve promotion effectiveness.
Originality/value – Our findings offer a new and easy tool to enhance sales promotions, which academic research and managerial practice had never considered previously.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1941-1967 |
| Number of pages | 27 |
| Journal | European Journal of Marketing |
| Volume | 58 |
| Issue number | 8 |
| Early online date | 8 Oct 2024 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 13 Nov 2024 |
Data Availability Statement
No data availability statement.Keywords
- Unit price
- shelf labels
- sales promotions
- dual processing
- heuristic cues