The interplay of intention maintenance and cue monitoring in younger and older adults' prospective memory

Nicola Ballhausen, Katharina M. Schnitzspahn, Sebastian S. Horn, Matthias Kliegel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

21 Citations (Scopus)
7 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The retention phase of a prospective memory (PM) task poses different challenges, including demands to store or maintain an intended action and to realize the right moment for action execution. The interplay of these processes in younger and older adults has not been explored so far. In this study, the authors examined the impact of maintenance load and task focality on PM in 84 younger and in 83 older adults. Results indicated that PM performance and ongoing task response times were strongly affected by maintenance load and age. However, a focality effect only emerged when maintenance load was low but not when attentional resources were deployed for maintaining a more demanding intention. These findings suggest that maintenance and monitoring requirements compete for similar attentional resources. Furthermore, maintenance load may affect postretrieval processes through its impact on working-memory resources, which can restrain the typical advantage of focal over nonfocal PM tasks.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1113-1125
Number of pages13
JournalMemory & Cognition
Volume45
Issue number7
Early online date9 Jun 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2017

Bibliographical note

We thank Jessica Wildberger, Justine Gouiller, and Anny Molnar Mafra for assistance with data collection and Sascha Zuber and Alexandra Hering for helpful comments on a prior version of the manuscript.

M.K. and K.M.S. acknowledge support from Swiss National Science Foundation.

Keywords

  • Prospective memory
  • Maintenance
  • Monitoring
  • Focality
  • Aging

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The interplay of intention maintenance and cue monitoring in younger and older adults' prospective memory'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this