Abstract
The development of the wind energy sector is often promoted as means of supporting rural economies. This paper focuses on how the ownership structure of on-shore wind power plants (external, farmer or community) affects the size and distribution of impacts within the rural part of the region. Empirical analysis is based on a regional CGE model of North East Scotland with the results compared to those generated from a standard SAM multiplier analysis. With no local ownership, while rural GDP increases, there is almost no effect on household incomes due to the limited direct linkages of the on-shore wind sector. Local ownership increases the household income benefits but there are still limited positive spill-over effects on the wider economy unless factor income is re-invested in local capital. With re-investment, farm household ownership gives rise to the largest increase in total household income but community ownership gives rise to the largest increase in rural (non-farm) household incomes and welfare. The results contribute to the ongoing debate about the opportunity cost of external asset ownership in rural areas.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 331-360 |
| Number of pages | 30 |
| Journal | Journal of Agricultural Economics |
| Volume | 63 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Early online date | 27 Mar 2012 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jun 2012 |
Keywords
- asset ownership
- rural development
- income benefits, wind power, CGE versus SAM assessments
- CGE vs. SAM assessments
- wind power D58
- Q42
- R11
- R13
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The role of ownership in determining the rural economic benefits of on-shore wind farms'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS